Sentences with phrase «judgments made when»

First impressions are usually split - second judgments made when one sees a person for the first time, and we all know they matter a lot especially in a professional environment.

Not exact matches

The «right to be forgotten» made headlines in the U.S. in 2014 when a citizen of Spain won a judgment that Google had to take down personal information about him.

When asked whether he would make different choices if he could start over, Bayard Winthrop, the CEO of apparel company American Giant, highlighted the value of his past errors in judgment.

When they appear is partially a matter of judgment — will they make a big impact here, or should I keep them up my sleeve?

«People make judgments about you... within less than a second so make sure when you walk in — even if you're nervous — you have that big smile ready to go,» she says.

Facebook has developed software that could help prevent issues that can arise when AI systems make incorrect judgments.

They concluded that we make a snap judgment in the first two seconds of meeting someone, and we rarely adjust it — even when we get more information.

«Relative deprivation is an idea that says that when we make judgments about ourselves, we judge ourselves next to our immediate peers — people like us in the same room as us — not to the world at large,» Gladwell said in a recent interview with author Daniel H. Pink.

When making assumptions about a drug's potential market penetration, you have to use your own best judgment.

Typically, when we make an error in judgment on a stock, we have confidence it will overcome any short - term headwinds and recover.

So many people are so quick to cast judgment on investors like Pabrai, David Einhorn, or Bill Ackman when they make big mistakes.

For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment; if he did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a herald of righteousness, with seven others, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly; if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes he condemned them to extinction, making them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly; and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the sensual conduct of the wicked (for as that righteous man lived among them day after day, he was tormenting his righteous soul over their lawless deeds that he saw and heard); then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment, and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

It's to the point with some Christian posters here that any criticism of their actions and religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.

Clichés are evidence of cloudy thought, and Phelps emits a stream of them in this concluding sentence: «Only when there is creativity and judgment will there be true innovations» new things that prove to work well, that have some staying power and make a mark.»

Sometimes these sources point in different directions — as when a right not recognized in the past becomes widely understood as fundamental — and a court has to make a judgment between the two lines of argument.

Now, Cobb is in a position to make judgments about when the liberation of the oppressed is appropriate and when it is not.

JB: When you make a value judgment don't you immediately step yourself outside of this evolutionary process and say that the reason this is good is that it's good.

The apostle Paul talks about this in Romans 14 when he explains that we must regard one another with kindness and without judgment for the decisions we make that keep us from stumbling in our faith.

When making snap judgments, people are more likely to misperceive a tool to be weapon when it is associated with black When making snap judgments, people are more likely to misperceive a tool to be weapon when it is associated with black when it is associated with black men.

But when we bring the principle of growth of persons in loving relationship to the judgment of marriages where the partners discover that they have made a mistake and that two people are destroying the possibility of growth in freedom and love, it is no violation of integrity to end the marriage so that each may seek a new life which is more responsible and genuinely productive.

And why should I, as a faithful lay member of the Church, have to disagree with the Church as represented by its shepherds when I make judgments of fact and feasibility, judgments on which people of goodwill may disagree?

is simply too ingrained, too much a part of what sin is all about, for us not to feel vexed when reminders come of the opposite reality, which it is precisely the office of religion to provide: «Accordingly, it has always been the office of Religion to protest against the sophistry of Satan, and to preserve the memory of those truths which the unbelieving heart corrupts: both the freedom and the responsibility of man, the sovereignty of the Creator, the supremacy of the law of conscience as His representative within us, and the irrelevancy of external circumstances in the judgment which is ultimately to be made upon our conduct and character.»

An honest, conscientious error of judgment, made by a person who is willing and able to change his mind when shown to be in the wrong, is a very different thing from the sin that Jesus condemned.

No, you can only forgive someone when they sin against you, and if you say that they are sinning against you, you have made a judgment about their actions.

This demand makes more comprehensible God's double aspect of love and justice: judgment is the individual's judgment of himself when he cuts himself off from relationship with God.

That is not the whole story, however, for at the end of the world, when God (so to speak) makes a complete evaluation of the creation, there will be a general judgment.

Therefore the tradition has spoken insistently of judgment — or to use perhaps a better word, appraisal — both moment by moment and at the conclusion of every human life, with a further appraisal made when the entire created order is evaluated in its contribution or failure to contribute to the advancement of the divine purpose in the world.

When we acknowledge Jesus as the center of our history, we make not only a judgment about the facts but also a confession of evaluation.

Even when we take issue with the way he describes some of these alternatives, or the judgment he makes concerning them, we find the clarity of perspective which he has brought to the consideration of these issues significant and helpful.

Or when a leader makes a judgment on the president he has no place making.

And when a moral judgment call is made without grace, it's not truth — it's slander.

It is after doing what is commanded, when everything has been done in the sphere of human decisions and means, when in terms of the relation to God every effort has been made to know the will of God and to obey it, when in the arena of life there has been full acceptance of all responsibilities and interpretations and commitments and conflicts, it is then and only then that the judgment takes on meaning: all this (that we had to do) is useless; all this we cast from us to put it in thy hands, O Lord; all this belongs no more to the human order but to the order of thy kingdom.

For to judge by the outcome (whereby an attempt is made to unite a judgment of temporal existence and of eternity into a judgment that comes after the event is past) is not humanly possible in the instant that a man himself acts, nor is it possible in the instant when others act.

(1) When the transcendent self makes a choice it requires and demands a transcendent norm above itself: this norm is God.27 (2) The image - of - God doctrine implies that man has a capacity for religious judgments, an ability to judge false gods.

And this has been made for sinners when they die and are buried in the earth and judgment has not been executed upon them in their lifetime.

When anyone categorically makes a judgment about another person based on their own opinion or stereotypes, that generally shuts down communication.

People who believe in immortality may think about God's judgment when any death occurs, it's part of the unknown dimension of death that makes us suspenseful, nervous, anxious, fearful.

If you are one of those people, do not bother saying you are on the side of Good when indoctrination has insured that you have no freedom to make that judgment for yourself.

LOL they have made thmselves judges of us all... and it is time for them to be judged so that they might repent before the great judgment when there is no repentance... This I would be glad to do... but for the finances required...

When Dawson made these judgments, in 1955, neo-scholasticism appeared to be impregnably self - confident and dominant in Catholic higher education, its attitude toward its critics either haughtily condemnatory or condescendingly tolerant.

When practicing the Law of Love, we are pretty much «flying by the seat of our pants,» relying on common sense and intuition rather than a moral manual or theological dogmas to keep us from making errors in judgment.

However, the meaning is found when the words find their meaning in our lives... how we think, our decision making, our judgment of situations, our values, etc..

When I noted to their champions that their psychological leanings seemed more like those of men than of women, I would get various replies, mostly to the effect that in making such judgments I was drawing on sexual stereotypes.

Moral maturity, at the human level, arises when one can emotionally sympathize, perhaps even suffer, with another and still make an independent moral judgment of him.

When moral rules and selves are abstracted from the normative traditions that give them substance and the social contexts that makes them concrete, «values» become little more than sentiments, moral judgments, expressions of individual preference.

It was not their own obedience, all too often patently surrendered, which made the Hebrews sure that God would not go back on his part of the covenant; it was their faith in his faithfulness that gave them confidence in his righteous judgments even when adversity seemed to indicate denial of his protection.

When all the facts that can be garnered are in, subjective judgments have to be made because not all the facts are in or can ever be unearthed, and facts anyway have to be interpreted (Andrewartha & Birch 1984 pp. 190 - 1).

When I'm on the campus of the Christian college here in town, I find myself making judgments about the students.

Shouldn't this alone make us cautious when we make judgments?