Since any rational judgement requires a rational mind, the crazy
judgments of religious people are always worthless.
Not exact matches
It's to the point with some Christian posters here that any criticism
of their actions and
religious beliefs garners the immediate
judgment that the
person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.
What he was getting round to saying was that «Failing to recognise RE amongst the humanities... surely implies a
judgment about what
religious education can contribute towards the formation and education
of the human
person?»
Wright notes that «Israel was thus constituted, from one point
of view, as the
people who heard God's word — in call, promise, liberation, guidance,
judgment, forgiveness, further
judgment, renewed liberation, and renewed promise... This is what I mean by denying that scripture can be reduced to the notion
of the «record
of a revelation,» in the sense
of a mere writing down
of earlier, and assumedly prior, «
religious experience.»
Although Egypt is entirely Sunni and most
of the
people are followers
of the Hanafi school, Azhar teaches the four schools without distinction, and the
religious courts pass
judgment according to the
religious school
of the defendant.
«My religion prevents me from hurting you for your lack
of belief in my hateful god, but you better watch out because (other, less - cowardly
religious people, angry jesus at
judgment day, etc.) will get you!»
I make these general remarks about the two sorts
of judgment, because there are many
religious persons — some
of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use
of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point
of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena
of religious experience must be considered.
Israel's
religious leaders had been moving towards monotheism, and the prophetic idea that Yahweh was using Israel's enemies as his agents in bringing
judgment on his sinful
people was a long step towards recognition
of his universal sway.
So many
people have been further harmed by the
judgment of their
religious peers who consider them spiritual failures for being physically or mentally ill.
On the basis
of experience from a variety
of sources a
religious person and the theologian formulate a theory which, like any theory dealing with complex issues in science, is a matter
of weighing one experience against another, together with much subjective
judgment.
Lord Chief Justice Morgan, delivering his
judgment, said: «Anyone who applies a
religious aspect or a political aspect to the provision
of services may be caught by equality legislation, not because the legislation treats their
religious belief or political opinion less favourably but because that
person seeks to distinguish, on a basis that is prohibited, between those who will receive that service and those who will not.»