Sentences with phrase «judgments on right»

You should always use your mind in making judgments on the right actions.

Second, judgments on right and wrong come down to on - balance discrimination.

I absolutely have no judgment on that right now because we haven't had a chance to do diligence.

This is why judgments on rights of access and judgments on return that have been certified in the Member State of origin in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation should be recognised and enforceable in all other Member States without any further procedure being required.

Specific information on judgments on rights of access where «exequatur» is requested under Article 28.

On 3 July 2000 France presented an initiative for a Council Regulation on the mutual enforcement of judgments on rights of access to children (6).

The Court of Appeal has recently delivered an important judgment on the right to property under Article 1 of the First Protocol ECHR (A1P1) in Breyer...

Not exact matches

It's based on my confidence that they will use their own judgment in terms of coming to the right decision.

The more I learned about the real Marcia Clark, not the two dimensional cardboard cutout I saw in the news, but the complicated, whip - smart giant - hearted mother of two, who woke up every day, put both feet on the floor and dedicated herself to righting an unconciscable wrong, the loss of two innocents Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown, the more I had to recognize that I, along with the rest of the world, had been superficial and careless in my judgment, and I'm here today to tell you I'm sorry,» Paulson said to Clark while onstage.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

Obviously, one wants to return to a more normal paradigm as rapidly as possible but I don't think that those who condemn it on principle are coming to the right judgment.

If you select the right companies, and buy them at a time when they are good value relative to the market conditions at the time, then you shouldn't have to trouble yourself with judgments on the market as a whole.

For me, it was a like a real eye opener, right from how it's very important to have a Financial Plan and have an objective for investing, to Goals, having Patience and confidence on your stocks, when is the right time to invest, valuations, how and why small investors should invest, how to not let your judgment be clouded by others, teaching investment as an ART to our children, and how to avoid the pitfalls of investing.

God's Judgments sometimes are quick sometimes are slow but in God's view they're always right on time.

I don't have the right to impose my preferences or moral judgments on them.»

On appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Missouri judgment but drew up far short of recognizing a right of individual patient autonomy.

It appears that he's trying to sift history and take a more «nuanced» view of how history formed Christianity... I wasn't really getting a value judgment from him on the right or wrong, just that it's a mixed bag, like all history is.

Men, one by one, now had status, each in his own right, and the sense of equity, no longer satisfied by mass judgment on mass sin, demanded fair play for every individual.

Ireland's highest court will deliver judgment later on a landmark case on the rights of the unborn.

«If the Church does not regard Israel from a Christian point of view,» he remarked, «if it does not recognize the theological significance of this people, having a national destiny that can be cultivated only in Zion, the Church has no right to pass judgment on Israel.»

But the fact is» or at least our firm judgment is» that on most of the great issues of that time, C&C was right and its critics were usually wrong.

Too many corners of the Church have been infected with a legalistic, performance - based view of God in which God stands over our lives with crossed arms and a disappointed scowl, applauding only when we get everything just right and rendering judgment on everything we do wrong.

Restrictions on the right to migrate should never be imposed arbitrarily or lightly, but the extent of the right is nevertheless a matter for prudential judgment.

But Novak persuasively suggests that there are three such rights: first, that God hear the cry of our prayer; second, that He tell us how we should live; and, third, that He render judgment on our actions, thus making us moral agents of consequence.

In my judgment, the «Social Principles» of the United Methodists, the «Statement on Economic Justice» of the Lutheran Church in America, the «Statement on Human Rights» of the United Church of Christ, and the World Council of Churches» themes of «Justice, Sustainability and Participation» are models of such efforts.

The insights here, ugly though some of them may be, have really helped me understand some of the «Christian» mentality, especially the people who jumped right in passing judgment on me, telling me to «calm down» and more.

And a lot of these things are happening around us, and somebody is going to get mad at me for saying what I am about to say right now, but I am going to give you my honest opinion: I think we have turned our back on the Scripture and on God Almighty and I think he has allowed judgment to fall upon us.

These are our greatest boons, which we would not surrender if we could; and the ancient biblical judgment on creation, «And God saw that it was good,» is profoundly right.

In an interview with the Church of Ireland Gazette, he also blamed negative attitudes towards the EU on recent European human rights judgments which he supported, saying: «The fact is, of course, we have absorbed the European Convention on Human Rights into British law anyway, so it is not as if there is some sinister global tyranny forcing us, herights judgments which he supported, saying: «The fact is, of course, we have absorbed the European Convention on Human Rights into British law anyway, so it is not as if there is some sinister global tyranny forcing us, heRights into British law anyway, so it is not as if there is some sinister global tyranny forcing us, he said.

on the day of judgment we will see who is right... for now Christians stop criticizing Islam....

I'm almost sensing from some that they think God has no right to set up a theocracy, and no right to pronounce his judgment on people.

As transhumanism becomes more prevalent, as the sexual revolution identifies more perversions as «rights,» as technocracy overtakes ethical reasoning and truth is more frequently confused with power, believers will find themselves ever more frequently in the position of explaining that some realities are not contingent on the prevailing ethos of culture, or on our judgments, or on the fleeting whims of self - definition.

In precisely the same way, the justices could press counsel to get clear on the principled lines of a judgment that would confer the right to marriage on couples of the same - sex, while barring the extension of marriage to all of these other ensembles, who will be in the courts before long, demanding to know why they too are not eligible for the same constitutional rights.

And, by the way, if anyone has the right to sit in judgment on others, it would be Jesus.

Humans participate in this, but due to our rebellion against God, came under His judgment, and unable to make right judgments on our own, and so our role in God's justice is limited.

This is certainly a step in the right direction of creating a balanced justice system — one in which big businesses can not capitalize on people's lapses in judgment.

The atmosphere of a legalistic ethos is filled with criticism, conditional fellowship based on preformed judgments of right conduct and right doctrine, and communication rooted only in having common ground.

On the specific point of women's ordination, I was not claiming for myself the right of private judgment.

Secular rationalism may be the right road, may be the Truth as it claims to be; but it has come to be felt that there is no a priori intellectual or universal reason for supposing so from the start, so that it may sit in unchallenged judgment on equally massive and venerated traditions, Christian, Hindu, or whatever, that make the same claim.

Hope you don't mind me referring to the Quran about many issues discussed but this is supposed to be the way of our lives as Muslims and to us this is our guiding light and that on judgment date who has the Book held in his right hand, he would be rewarded for it, and those appeared holding Book in his left hand will be punished for it?

One of the central tenets of their belief system is that God judges nations as well as men, so they absolutely claim the right to force others into their own belief to forestall God's judgment on the nation they live in.

It would ne nice to accept our own moral compasses or as I put it «a morally correct manner» and then leave it at that, accept only detailed proven facts and then use your best judgment on the rest, its more likely to be right then listening or reading «facts» by those who tell you to not look for them or prove them one way r the other, that's the Fox News of the religious world... Religion is more dangerous then a blind man in a room of razors, it hurts, kills and destroys more of humanity then any «God Made» disaster.

When it entered the lease, Harris Farm did not know Woolworths had the first right of refusal and chief executive Angus Harris was reassured by About Life's chairman of directors Michael Green there were no restrictions on selling the store, the judgment says.

What's so crazy about all this is that we live in a society where people are loath to pass judgment on even the most deviant sexual practices, right?

No one has any right to pass any form of judgment on a persons personal decisions.

Tuesday 2.30 pm - Sir Nicolas Bratza, President of the European Court of Human Rights and Erik Fribergh, Registrar of the Court, speak in front of the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the subject «Human Rights Judgments.

Delivering judgment on Tuesday, Justice John Tsoho, in giving the EFCC a go - ahead to continue and conclude its ongoing investigations, struck out the fundamental human rights enforcement suit filed by the former First Lady against the anti-graft agency.

PM says judgment is step in right direction, as he seeks legal backing for further welfare restrictions on EU migrants

However, the defendant proceeded to infringe on theconsent judgment regarding exclusive content rights of the plaintiff by setting up a new television channel on its Champion TV decoder under the trade name, Top TV 2, which was used to broadcast the 2016/17 season of the EPL.

The judgment of the ECHR in the Hirst case flies in the face of the original wording and purpose of the European convention on human rights, in which it was clearly intended that each signatory should have latitude in making decisions on the electoral franchise in that country.