Sentences with phrase «judicial act»

On the other hand, if the JCC issues a finding of fact that the complained of actions of the judge were not judicial acts, (i.e. a violation of the criminal code) then the judge should not be protected by judicial immunity.
«The doctrine of judicial immunity affords state judges absolute immunity for past judicial acts regarding matters within their court's jurisdiction, even if their exercise of authority is flawed by the commission of grave procedural errors.»
Judicial immunity, which generally provides a judge's personal assets can not be taken for an official judicial act, would be removed.
For exactly this reason, Advocate General Léger rightly advised in his opinion in the Baustahlgewebe case that the jurisdiction of the General Court must be understood «as not extending to actions for compensation relating to judicial acts of that Court itself» (para 70).
On the other hand, if the JCC issues a finding of fact that the complained of actions of the judge were not judicial acts, then the judge should not be protected by judicial immunity.
In Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 211 U. S. 90 - 91 (1908), the Court said: «The judicial act of the highest court of the State, in authoritatively construing and enforcing its laws, is the act of the State.»
Professor Elizabeth Judge explains in «Precedent and the Individual Opinion: Judges Judging Judgments and the Creation of the Law Canon», the act of «authorizing precedent... deflect [s] attention away from the judicial acts of authoring the individual opinion».
A judge of a superior court is not liable for anything done by him while he is «acting as a judge,» or «doing a judicial act» or «acting judicially» or «in the execution of his office»... «What do all these mean?
court of Orleans is created, taken in connection with the Judicial Act, and that a writ of error would lie to a judgment rendered by the court for the District of Kentucky in such a case as this.
The words «without prejudice» in their general adaptation, when used in a decree, mean that there is no decision of the controversy on its merits, and leaves the whole subject in litigation as much open to another suit as if no suit had ever been brought... When the words «without prejudice» appear in an order or decree, it shows that the judicial act done is not intended to be res judicata of the merits of the controversy.
I believe [the] entry of the order is a judicial act, not an administrative one.
Detailed consideration of the definition of a «judicial act» and its application to the Parole Board.
And if there are other treaty standards available to a foreign investor for asserting claims arising out of a judicial act or omission, is it still necessary to exhaust local remedies?
Thus, they are clearly entitled to immunity from civil complaints stemming from their judicial acts
If the act is a judicial act, it is not touched by the federal Constitution, and if it is a legislative
The advent of no - fault divorce in every state gives rise to the prevailing concept of the «uncontested divorce» — a divorce in which the parties have resolved any outstanding issues and all that remains is the judicial act of ending the marriage.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z