And if it be not so exercised,
the judicial authority of the state only, between its own citizens, can interpose and prevent the wrong, or repair it in damages.
When this court reverses the judgment, they overrule both the legislative and
judicial authority of the state, without regard to the character or standing, political or judicial, of the individual members of either department; surely, then, it is our most solemn duty, not to found our judgment on the opinions of those who assume to decide on the validity of state laws, without any official power, sanction or responsibility.
Not exact matches
and finally resolved by arbitration in the United
States under Nevada
State Law which will be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this clause, save for any waiver
of any rights the parties would otherwise have to any form
of appeal or recourse to a court
of law or other
judicial authority, which rights are expressly reserved.
The first, thus may be considered as the military responsibility and the second the
judicial responsibility
of the sovereign, the
state or the public
authority.
There is also the small matter
of persuading sponsors and the
judicial authorities of both the United
States and Switzerland that the «owner»
of the world's most popular sport is on the right track back to economic and political sanity.
We are happy to report in response to a lawsuit filed against the Commonwealth's regulatory use
of priority habitat screening to protect endangered species, the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court has ruled unanimously to affirm the
state's
authority under the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA).
The
judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws
of the United
States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their
Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases
of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United
States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more
States; — between a
State and Citizens
of another
State; — between Citizens
of different
States; — between Citizens
of the same
State claiming Lands under Grants
of different
States, and between a
State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign
States, Citizens or Subjects.
With the early and unexpected departure
of yet another top judge, Gov. Cuomo will soon be making his fifth and sixth appointments to the seven - member Court
of Appeals, the
state's highest
judicial authority.
The new coalition points to a number
of potential changes to the constitution that they would like to see, including the creation
of a public financing system for campaigns, election reforms like same - day registration, court reforms to make it easier to navigate the
judicial system and the ability for local municipalities to exercise greater control over issues they traditionally need
state authority to manage.
Another issue in 2014 was the Democratic governor's perceived use
of his
judicial nominating
authority to reward political loyalty; one
of his two 66 - year - old nominees was Anthony Avallone, a former 10 - year
state senator from New Haven and a longtime member
of the Democratic National Committee.
He argues that «under any conception
of our separation
of powers, I would have thought powerful and centralized
authorities like today's administrative agencies would have warranted less deference from other branches, not more,» and that
judicial deference has «added prodigious new powers to an already titanic administrative
state.»
The decisions
of public bodies, such as the Secretary
of State (and therefore
of RSCs where they assume the powers
of the Secretary
of State), local
authorities and schools can be challenged by way
of judicial review and other appropriate proceedings in the High Court.
A veterinarian who is licensed in another
state, and who is in good standing in such
state, providing services directly in connection with an investigation by law enforcement
of an alleged violation
of federal or
state animal fighting or animal cruelty laws, within the scope
of the investigation and / or any related
judicial proceedings, subject to the following requirements: (a) an official invitation has been extended to the veterinarian for a specified period
of time by the law enforcement
authority with jurisdiction over the investigation; and (b) such law enforcement
authority determines that the veterinarian possesses skills, training, or experience necessary and relevant to such investigation
of alleged incidents
of animal fighting or animal cruelty.
A technician who is licensed in another
state, and who is in good standing in such
state, providing veterinary technology services otherwise permissible pursuant to this article directly in connection with an investigation by law enforcement
of an alleged violation
of federal or
state animal fighting or animal cruelty laws, within the scope
of the investigation and / or any related
judicial proceedings, subject to the following requirements: (a) an official invitation has been extended to the technician for a specified period
of time by the law enforcement
authority with jurisdiction over the investigation; and (b) such law enforcement
authority determines that the technician possesses skills, training, or experience necessary and relevant to such investigation
of alleged incidents
of animal fighting or animal cruelty.
That the bill presents a case for
judicial consideration arising under the laws
of the United
States and treaties made under their
authority with the Cherokee Nation, and which laws and treaties have been, and are threatened to be still further, violated by the laws
of the
State of Georgia referred to in this opinion.
The parties also irrevocably waive their rights to any form
of appeal, review or recourse to any
State court or other
judicial authority with respect to such Award insofar as such waiver may be validly made.»
This requires a
State, at a minimum, to establish the following to a Competent
Judicial Authority, prior to conducting Communications Surveillance for the purposes
of enforcing law, protecting national security, or gathering intelligence:
102] Bot goes even further to
state that the Spanish interpretation would «paralyse the execution by the Spanish
judicial authorities of European arrest warrants issued for the purpose
of executing judgments rendered in absentia, unless the issuing Member
States could guarantee the persons concerned a retrial.»
In that
state, regulatory
authority is spread among the various
judicial departments, resulting in a Balkanized system that makes the development
of regulatory initiatives more difficult.
For the less secure a judge's
authority — and
judicial authority was far less secure then than it is in the United
States today — the greater his need to represent himself as merely an oracle
of the law.
Data is relatively limited and fairly dated as to the diversity composition
of various
state benches; most
authorities cite a report by the American Bar Association Standing Committee on
Judicial Independence (first published in 2004 and updated last in 2010) or a 2009 compilation
of data by the American Judicature Society.
As it did in 2012, Florida's house
of representatives has proposed giving the governor greater
authority over the membership
of the
state's
judicial nominating commissions.
This seventh and final installment looks at efforts to change
state constitutional grants
of rulemaking
authority to courts
of last resort, typically called the «supreme court», or
judicial councils.
As a pupil, Zac was also involved in: R (on the application
of RWE Generation UK Plc) v Gas and Electricity Markets
Authority [2016] 1 CMLR 17, a challenge against a decision modifying the charges imposed on users
of the National Grid (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); Speed Medical Examination Services Ltd v Secretary
of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 3585, a
judicial review challenging reforms to the process for handling whiplash claims (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); and an application for interim relief by a company that had been redesignated under a European Union sanctions regime (as a pupil assisting Maya Lester).
By contrast, whether the Charter also applies to the national rules determining under what conditions police and
judicial authorities can access the retained data is less obvious, because Directive 2002 / 58 / EC does not cover «activities
of the
State in areas
of criminal law» (Art. 1 (3)-RRB-.
In July, Barrett's office sued Nixon in
state court, alleging he exceeded his
authority because public defenders are part
of the
judicial branch.
However, if it was an issuing
state, there is a chance the specified
judicial or designated
authority wouldn't pursue the EAW in minor offences, as it would be simply too expensive comparing to an interest
of justice.
He added: «Turkey's own Constitution
states that judges «shall be independent in the discharge
of their duties... No organ,
authority, office or individual may give orders or instructions to courts or judges related to the exercise
of judicial power».
According to the principle
of mutual recognition, a decision adopted by a
judicial authority of a Member
State (the issuing Member
State), on the grounds
of its internal legislation, must be recognised, accepted and executed by the executing Member
States»
judicial authorities, even though the same case, according to the executing Member
States» law, could lead to a different outcome.
Lord Justice Lloyd Jones held that «While I readily accept the fundamental importance
of the guarantees provided by Article 5, it does not follow that Article 5 must be equated for all purposes with Articles 2, 3 and 4... In the present
state of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, enforced disappearance cases are acknowledged to give rise to an investigative obligation because where agents of the State have assumed control over an individual it is incumbent on the authorities to account for his or her whereabouts... I can see no reason in principle why it should be extended to all cases in which a person has been detained in the absence of judicial scrutiny or control, even if the detention is not secret or unacknowle
state of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, enforced disappearance cases are acknowledged to give rise to an investigative obligation because where agents
of the
State have assumed control over an individual it is incumbent on the authorities to account for his or her whereabouts... I can see no reason in principle why it should be extended to all cases in which a person has been detained in the absence of judicial scrutiny or control, even if the detention is not secret or unacknowle
State have assumed control over an individual it is incumbent on the
authorities to account for his or her whereabouts... I can see no reason in principle why it should be extended to all cases in which a person has been detained in the absence
of judicial scrutiny or control, even if the detention is not secret or unacknowledged.
HB 7455 Requires governor and nominating
authorities in making appointments to
judicial nominating commission «ensure that the membership
of the commission reflects the racial, ethnic, and gender diversity
of the
state's population.»
«Legal and non - legal [
Judicial and non-judicial] documents and papers relating [pertaining] to civil, commercial and administrative cases and cases of personal status required to be served or notified to [which are to be published or which are to be transmitted to] persons residing in one of the contracting states shall be sent [dispatched] directly by the authority or the competent legal office [from the judicial body or officer concerned] to the court which the person who is required to be served or notified resides in its jurisdiction area [to the court of the district in which the person to be notified resides]
Judicial and non-
judicial] documents and papers relating [pertaining] to civil, commercial and administrative cases and cases of personal status required to be served or notified to [which are to be published or which are to be transmitted to] persons residing in one of the contracting states shall be sent [dispatched] directly by the authority or the competent legal office [from the judicial body or officer concerned] to the court which the person who is required to be served or notified resides in its jurisdiction area [to the court of the district in which the person to be notified resides]
judicial] documents and papers relating [pertaining] to civil, commercial and administrative cases and cases
of personal status required to be served or notified to [which are to be published or which are to be transmitted to] persons residing in one
of the contracting
states shall be sent [dispatched] directly by the
authority or the competent legal office [from the
judicial body or officer concerned] to the court which the person who is required to be served or notified resides in its jurisdiction area [to the court of the district in which the person to be notified resides]
judicial body or officer concerned] to the court which the person who is required to be served or notified resides in its jurisdiction area [to the court
of the district in which the person to be notified resides]».
«The doctrine
of judicial immunity affords
state judges absolute immunity for past
judicial acts regarding matters within their court's jurisdiction, even if their exercise
of authority is flawed by the commission
of grave procedural errors.»
Specifically, California Constitution Article VI, § 6 (d), which provides the
authority of the
Judicial Council to promulgate the Rules
of Court,
states that the «council shall... adopt rules for court administration, practice and procedure, and perform other functions prescribed by statute.
In this class
of cases, we think the rule
of action which should govern the civil courts, founded in a broad and sound view
of the relations
of church and
state under our system
of laws, and supported by a preponderating weight
of judicial authority, is that whenever the questions
of discipline or
of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom, or law have been decided by the highest
of these church judicatories to which the matter has been carried, the legal tribunals must accept such decisions as final and as binding on them in their application to the case before them.
If we defer to political
authority, there can be none higher than the three branches
of the legislative power; if to
judicial authority, the highest is the solemn judgment
of the members
of the court, in which is vested the supreme
judicial power
of the
state.
It is widely expected that investor -
State arbitration should fulfill a role similar to that
of judicial review under domestic administrative and constitutional law, subjecting host
State public
authority to an understanding
of the rule
of law that focuses chiefly on restrictions in the relations between public and private actors.
In my judgment, the opinion
of the majority
of the court in that case is in conflict with its previous decisions, with a great weight
of judicial authority in other slaveholding
States, and with fundamental principles
of private international law.
«the
judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity arising under the Constitution, the laws
of the United
States, or treaties made or which shall be made under their
authority; to all cases affecting ambassadors or other public ministers and consuls; to all cases
of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; to controversies, to which the United
-- closer cooperation between
judicial and other competent authorities of the Member States including cooperation through the European Judicial Cooperation Unit («Eurojust»), in accordance with the provisions of Articles 31
judicial and other competent
authorities of the Member
States including cooperation through the European
Judicial Cooperation Unit («Eurojust»), in accordance with the provisions of Articles 31
Judicial Cooperation Unit («Eurojust»), in accordance with the provisions
of Articles 31 and 32,
The Courts provided for in subsection A
of this section, when exercising their
judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United
States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United
States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law
of another
state of the United
States provided the law
of the other
state does not include Sharia Law, in making
judicial decisions.
[23] From time to time the ABA reasserts that the
authority to regulate lawyers, if not the legal services market as a whole, not only lies with
state supreme courts or the
judicial branch
of government, but also that it should lie there.
Where the
judicial or administrative
authority in the requested
State has reason to believe that the child has been taken to another
State, it may stay the proceedings or dismiss the application for the return
of the child.
Article 30 Any application submitted to the Central
Authorities or directly to the judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State in accordance with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contract
Authorities or directly to the
judicial or administrative
authorities of a Contracting State in accordance with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contract
authorities of a Contracting
State in accordance with the terms
of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central
Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative
authorities of the Contract
authorities of the Contracting
States.
Article 41 Where a Contracting
State has a system
of government under which executive,
judicial and legislative powers are distributed between central and other
authorities within that
State, its signature or ratification, acceptance or approval
of, or accession to this Convention, or its making
of any declaration in terms
of Article 40 shall carry no implication as to the internal distribution
of powers within that
State.
Where a Contracting
State has a system
of government under which executive,
judicial and legislative powers are distributed between central and other
authorities within that
State, its signature or ratification, acceptance or approval
of, or accession to this Convention, or its making
of any declaration in terms
of Article 40 shall carry no implication as to the internal distribution
of powers within that
State.
Article 14 In ascertaining whether there has been a wrongful removal or retention within the meaning
of Article 3, the
judicial or administrative
authorities of the requested
State may take notice directly
of the law
of, and
of judicial or administrative decisions, formally recognised or not in the
State of the habitual residence
of the child, without recourse to the specific procedures for the proof
of that law or for the recognition
of foreign decisions which would otherwise be applicable.
Where a child has been wrongfully removed or retained in terms
of Article 3 and, at the date
of the commencement
of the proceedings before the
judicial or administrative
authority of the Contracting
State where the child is, a period
of less than one year has elapsed from the date
of the wrongful removal or retention, the
authority concerned shall order the return
of the child forthwith.
Any application submitted to the Central
Authorities or directly to the judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State in accordance with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contract
Authorities or directly to the
judicial or administrative
authorities of a Contracting State in accordance with the terms of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative authorities of the Contract
authorities of a Contracting
State in accordance with the terms
of this Convention, together with documents and any other information appended thereto or provided by a Central
Authority, shall be admissible in the courts or administrative
authorities of the Contract
authorities of the Contracting
States.
(4) Nothing in this Article or Article 7 shall be interpreted as imposing an obligation on a Central
Authority to exercise powers that can be exercised only by
judicial authorities under the law
of the requested
State.