Not exact matches
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and
biases about religion, but the
judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity,
if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.
Arguing that the judge's Twitter activity isn't a proper subject for
judicial notice, the government claimed that even
if the feed in question is the judge's Twitter feed, his tweeting the headline to an article about a ruling he already made «would not show
bias or even an appearance of partiality.»
If you've ever been to court on your own, you're likely all too familiar with
judicial bias.
Further,
if the discipline committee (and the entire Board) have been exposed to a «mediation agreement» relating to the respondent, such that the members of the Discipline Committee might be precluded from hearing the matter, due to a reasonable apprehension of
bias, a
judicial review will still be premature
if any possibility remains an unbiased discipline panel being convened.
If a judicial candidate, before becoming judge, actively campaigns on partisan issues in violation of the Judicial Conduct Code, and if a candidate for judicial office pledges to be biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will suffe
If a
judicial candidate, before becoming judge, actively campaigns on partisan issues in violation of the Judicial Conduct Code, and if a candidate for judicial office pledges to be biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will
judicial candidate, before becoming judge, actively campaigns on partisan issues in violation of the
Judicial Conduct Code, and if a candidate for judicial office pledges to be biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will
Judicial Conduct Code, and
if a candidate for judicial office pledges to be biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will suffe
if a candidate for
judicial office pledges to be biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will
judicial office pledges to be
biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the judiciary will suffer.
Judicial disqualification is warranted
if the judge is actually
biased or prejudiced or
if the judge, based on objective and reasonable perceptions, has either a serious risk of actual
bias impacting the due process rights of a party or has failed to adhere to the appearance of impropriety standard set forth in Canon 2 of the Michigan Code of
Judicial Conduct.
If you are a parental alienator, here are a few easy steps that you can adopt so that you can lose custody of your child and then blame it all on the
biased judicial system: