All Member States should be mandated to publish a public call, then to put forward a list of at least three
candidates for each
judicial position, selected on the basis of a number of additional obligations
regarding gender balance, management skills and professional background of the applicants.
2008): A
judicial candidate sought an injunction against enforcement of several canons of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, regarding his campaign adve
judicial candidate sought an injunction against enforcement of several canons of the Ohio Code of
Judicial Conduct, regarding his campaign adve
Judicial Conduct,
regarding his campaign advertising.
2011): On remand from the Ninth Circuit, the district court considered the merits of the
candidate's claims
regarding the solicitation, endorsement, and political activities clauses of the Arizona Code of
Judicial Conduct.
[1]
Regarding the term «
judicial candidate,» in Arkansas, there are no retention elections, and selection by appointment arises in limited situations, such as to fill a newly created judgeship or a vacancy.
Section 7A (3)(e) prohibits a
candidate for
judicial office from making statements that commit the
candidate regarding cases, controversies or issues likely to come before the court.
«That approach could include a more broadly representative and inclusive
judicial advisory selection panel, where no political party has a majority (as the government now gives itself), parliamentarians as a whole are in the minority, and the provincial attorney general and provincial bar are represented, along with the Canadian Bar Association and the Canadian Judicial Conference; a protocol of consultation published by the minister of justice, setting out whom the minister intends to consult and with whom the advisory panel will meet; a public announcement by the minister of the criteria by which each candidate will be evaluated; and a final hearing at which the minister of justice — and not only the nominee — answers questions from parliamentarians, notably regarding how the nominee meets the established criteria,» he wro
judicial advisory selection panel, where no political party has a majority (as the government now gives itself), parliamentarians as a whole are in the minority, and the provincial attorney general and provincial bar are represented, along with the Canadian Bar Association and the Canadian
Judicial Conference; a protocol of consultation published by the minister of justice, setting out whom the minister intends to consult and with whom the advisory panel will meet; a public announcement by the minister of the criteria by which each candidate will be evaluated; and a final hearing at which the minister of justice — and not only the nominee — answers questions from parliamentarians, notably regarding how the nominee meets the established criteria,» he wro
Judicial Conference; a protocol of consultation published by the minister of justice, setting out whom the minister intends to consult and with whom the advisory panel will meet; a public announcement by the minister of the criteria by which each
candidate will be evaluated; and a final hearing at which the minister of justice — and not only the nominee — answers questions from parliamentarians, notably
regarding how the nominee meets the established criteria,» he wrote then.