For some unexplained reason, the federal
judicial code does not.
Not exact matches
The
Code of Conduct further provides in Rule 5 (B) that a judge may engage in «avocational activities», that is «activities to improve the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice if such avocational activities
do not detract from the dignity of his office or interfere with the performance of his
judicial duties».
«EFCC seems to be dilly - dallying, which prompted me to apply for
judicial review, to wit - Order of Mandamus, compelling them to
do their public duty and for the ICPC to release to
Code of Conduct, forms Chime filled before he became governor in 2007 to enable us determine the extent of cannibalization.
Judges must also
do a better job explaining why the
judicial code forbids them from discussing cases, she said, because their silence after controversial rulings is misread as arrogance or cowardice.
The Model Penal
Code: Sentencing project provides guidance on some of the most important issues that courts, corrections systems, and policymakers are facing today, including the general purposes of the sentencing system; rules governing sentence severity — including sentences of incarceration, community supervision, and economic penalties; the elimination of mandatory minimum penalties; mechanisms for combating racial and ethnic disparities in punishment; instruments of prison population control; victims» rights in the sentencing process; the sentencing of juvenile offenders in adult courts; the creation of
judicial powers to review many collateral consequences of conviction; and many issues having to
do with
judicial sentencing discretion, sentencing commissions, sentencing guidelines, and appellate sentence review.
When the law states that parties have to consider ADR, as it now
does in Quebec (or rather will when section 1 of the new
Code of Civil Procedure comes into force), it's no longer an alternative to the
judicial system; it's a part of it...
They
do it for the state of Georgia, which applies copyright, but the state of Georgia applies copyright to many different components of the Official
Code of Georgia Annotated, not just to
judicial summaries.
The Courts provided for in subsection A of this section, when exercising their
judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United States
Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state
does not include Sharia Law, in making
judicial decisions.
For purposes of this
Code, the term
does not include a
judicial candidate's campaign committee created as authorized by Rule 4.4.
Charge 29 relates to Criminal
Code section 119 (1)(a), which sets out that «everyone is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who... being the holder of a
judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything
done or omitted or to be
done or omitted by them in their official capacity.»
A judge may accept compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the law - related and extrajudicial activities permitted by this
Code if the source of the payments
does not give the appearance of influencing the judge in the judge's
judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety, subject to the following restrictions:
The
Code is to be construed so it
does not impinge on the essential independence of judges in making
judicial decisions.
The courts provided for in this section, when exercising their
judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Missouri, the United States
Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States, provided the law of the other state
does not include sharia law, in making
judicial decisions.
Under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.
Code § 1651 - Writs, it appears that it can only be invoked IF AND ONLY IF there are no other «
Judicial Tools Available» — What
does this mean?