CROs additionally attracted
judicial criticism in the past for lacking transparency, despite the fact that CROs are a flexible and straightforward means of achieving resolution between repentant and reformed companies and the SFO.
Not exact matches
Criticism of the scope of
judicial power is often perceived by its partisans as,
in effect, attacking the independence of the judiciary or even the ideal of
judicial independence.
Therefore, lawyers shouldn't be reluctant to offer public
criticism of the judiciary, as informed, sustained
criticism rooted firmly
in Nigerian reality, can contribute to
judicial accountability.
However to me (as a Czech resident) this
criticism seems a bit strange since
in the Czech Republic judges have always been nominated directly by the executive (subject to approval by the Parliament) and therefore the
judicial system has never really been independent
in the first place.
However, there is much
criticism of his record, given the level of political and
judicial corruption
in his borough, to successfully prosecute the perpetrators.
In the event that this legal action against Mr Hain succeeded members of parliament and even Ministers would feel extraordinarily constrained in any criticism they might make of the judicial process and judiciary in the United Kingdo
In the event that this legal action against Mr Hain succeeded members of parliament and even Ministers would feel extraordinarily constrained
in any criticism they might make of the judicial process and judiciary in the United Kingdo
in any
criticism they might make of the
judicial process and judiciary
in the United Kingdo
in the United Kingdom.
There's certainly
judicial experience there, but perhaps not as much as
in prior years — which is partly a response to
criticisms that prior nominating lists didn't include enough representation from the private bar.
In part as a response to this
criticism, the Member States revised the old article on
judicial review by adding a sentence to the paragraph on the locus standi of non-privileged applicants.
Based upon complaints filed by, among others, Washington DC based
Judicial Watch, the Commission had sought to remove Judge Kendall from the bench on the basis of
criticisms of his bail and sentencing decisions
in specific cases, none of which had ever been appealed and each of which was soundly within his legal discretion.
In another remarkable part of the book (chapter 2), Conway fleshes out his claim that EU law scholarship fails to address shortcomings of
judicial reasoning of the CJEU with sufficient
criticism.
She also suggests that actors
in the legal system are complicit
in judicial arrogance while simultaneously having considerable arrogance of their own: lawyers and judges alike deny the rationality and dignity of the «non-lawyer,» refuse to admit their own faults, and tend both to aggrandize official power and to subdue public
criticism.
In applying the criteria laid out by the Court, the AG pays little attention to the fact that the tribunals are set up by an international agreement rather than through domestic law, to the ad - hoc nature of ISDS, and to the long - held
criticism that ISDS arbitrators lack the basic
judicial safeguards for
judicial independence.
In reality the Bill simply seeks to correct the perceived mistakes enacted in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a piece of legislation that has been subject of severe criticism in judicial circle
In reality the Bill simply seeks to correct the perceived mistakes enacted
in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a piece of legislation that has been subject of severe criticism in judicial circle
in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a piece of legislation that has been subject of severe
criticism in judicial circle
in judicial circles.
«The panel finds that Justice Matlow participated
in controversial political discussions, inappropriately used the privileged platform of
judicial office, publicly offered legal advice and
criticism, took a role
in litigation that was likely to come before his court, communicated with the press
in the course of advancing a specific point of view
in a legal and political dispute against a party that was imminently to appear before him
in litigation, and failed to ensure that his actions and the extent of his involvement
in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the panel.
Here I'm struck by the contrast between the accounts of the prevalence of «whacking» and the
judicial response to it (e.g. that it is common and the courts / crowns rarely intervene) and accounts that I hear from practicing crowns (e.g. that it is uncommon and, when it occurs, the court's response vigorously and, further, that the court, crown and police are uncommonly solicitous to complainants
in sexual assault cases — a claim that the Ghomeshi cases seems to confirm given the seemingly well - founded
criticism of the police
in that case for failing to adequately probe the complainant's allegations, meaning that inconsistencies
in their statements were discovered on cross-examination by the defense, fatally undermining their credibility).
Carelessness can have grave consequences on other court users through loss of trial dates, cluttering of the
judicial diary — NB every case is fact specific,
in terms of the
judicial perception of a party's conduct; weak excuses of the type «I didn't mean to become non-compliant» may be the subject of stringent
criticism.
In 1997, Peter Hogg responded to criticisms of judicial activism in the post-Charter era by suggesting that the legislature is instead involved in a flexible and dynamic relationship with the courts over Charter right
In 1997, Peter Hogg responded to
criticisms of
judicial activism
in the post-Charter era by suggesting that the legislature is instead involved in a flexible and dynamic relationship with the courts over Charter right
in the post-Charter era by suggesting that the legislature is instead involved
in a flexible and dynamic relationship with the courts over Charter right
in a flexible and dynamic relationship with the courts over Charter rights.
Strong
judicial criticism came
in the cases of J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 153 (Nov), Seagrove v Sullivan [2014] EWHC 4110 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 61 (Dec).
In my ongoing efforts to highlight
judicial criticism of expert witnesses who stray into advocacy, reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, excluding an expert report for numerous reasons including concerns about plagiarism.
At a moment at which there are many serious
criticisms of liberalism and / or questions about its future, combined with substantial unanimity among legal academics about various progressive values (as seen, to be clear, through an establishment lens) and the routine invocation
in current scholarly and public writing of things like «rule of law,» faith
in judicial review, and so on, there is a lot of room for interesting and valuable work questioning those assumptions and premises.
«More lawyers join
criticism of Keller; Latest complaint against judge
in death row case also includes signatures of other judges»: The Houston Chronicle today contains an article that begins, «Joining a swelling tide of
criticism, 130 attorneys from Harris County have filed a
judicial conduct complaint condemning the actions of Judge Sharon Keller, who presides over the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
In this dispute, Koskie Minsky said the court shouldn't award Rochon Genova the case because of the history of
judicial criticism of the Merchant Law Group, one of the members of the Rochon consortium.
The CanWest News Service article entitled Funding for minority groups to challenge federal laws under review reports that the program, first set up under former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, «has been the target of harsh
criticism from social conservatives and critics of so - called
judicial activism, who assert the initiative is a slush - fund for left - leaning groups to circumvent the will of elected legislators by challenging them
in court».
Many factors, including unfair or uninformed
criticism, or simple misunderstanding of the
judicial role, can adversely influence public confidence
in and respect for the judiciary.
Such public
criticism could only have a negative impact on public confidence
in the
judicial system and
in the moral authority and integrity of the judiciary, and thereby on the independence of the judiciary
in Canada.
The first
judicial use appears to derive from 1853 when Judge Levi Hubbell told US Attorney General Caleb Cushing, who had responded testily to
criticism of his handling of the case: «Judge Cushing has commenced a suit
in the United States Court.
But the takeaway here, as with most cases of
judicial criticism, is that care and diligence are
in order when taking judges to task.
But because this report's constructive
criticisms seem to fall largely on deaf ears
in Sacramento and
in many courthouses around the state, this year's look at the West Coast's perennial
Judicial Hellhole will pragmatically limit its focus to an armful of the state's civil injustices, including precedent - defying state supreme court decisions, the Private Attorneys General Act, Prop 65, food and beverage litigation, innovator liability, the California Environmental Quality Act's impact on affordable housing, courts» expansions of public nuisance law and natural disaster - chasing personal injury lawyers, among others.
But when the court did just that on Oct. 14, it drew wide
criticism for missing an opportunity to resolve a long - running dispute over
judicial discretion
in sentencing.