The SJC for the first time ruled that
a judicial error of law does not bar recovery in a legal malpractice case where a defendant law firm was negligent for failing to prevent or mitigate the legal error.
Not exact matches
Albert Camus's essay «Reflections on the Guillotine» cites a 19th - century French jurist's application
of the
law of probability to the chance
of a
judicial error with a result
of one innocent man's being condemned in every 257 criminal cases.
First, the demise
of the distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional
error of law, along with the eradication in Ridge v Baldwin
of the distinction between quasi-
judicial and administrative decisions, paved the way for the development
of a unified set
of principles —
of legality, rationality and procedural propriety —
of judicial review
of administrative action.
So long as there is some basis for an inference — in other words, the particular inference is reasonably open — even if that inference appears to have been drawn as a result
of illogical reasoning, there is no place for
judicial review because no
error of law has taken place.»
Rather than equating the FSA's reliance on the privileged material with the public
law concept
of taking into account an irrelevant matter, the judge held that it was more accurate to consider the
error as equivalent to a
judicial or administrative body acting, in part, on inadmissible evidence.
We are at a loss to understand upon what principle
of law, applicable to appellate jurisdiction, it can be supposed that this court has not
judicial authority to correct the last - mentioned
error because they had before corrected the former, or by what process
of reasoning it can be made out that the
error of an inferior court in actually pronouncing judgment for one
of the parties in a case in which it had no jurisdiction can not be looked into or corrected by this court because we have decided a similar question presented in the pleadings.
I consider, therefore, that, when there was a plea to the jurisdiction
of the Circuit Court in a case brought here by a writ
of error, the first duty
of this court is sua sponte, if not moved to it by either party, to examine the sufficiency
of that plea, and thus to take care that neither the Circuit Court nor this court shall use the
judicial power
of the United States in a case to which the Constitution and
laws of the United States have not extended that power.
The House
of Lords, blasting aside arcane distinctions, said that this provision was not enough to oust
judicial review for
error of law.
They may lose their cases for a host
of reasons unrelated to the merits such as
judicial error, refusal or inability
of witnesses to testify, novel interpretations in he
law or the vagaries
of jury verdicts.
Accordingly, on an appeal from a
judicial decision, the interpretation
of a non-standard form contract is normally reviewable only for palpable and overriding
error unless there is an extricable question
of law.
Judicial adventurism in Anisminic paved the way for Racal, where Lord Diplock, in obiter dicta, misinterpreted Anisminic to find that an administrative decision based on an
error of law is automatically a nullity.
When you throw
judicial error into the mix,
law really is the wild west in terms
of ethical enforcement and
error detection.
If it may be thought that any
error was entailed in the Court's perception
of jurisdiction, such an apprehension by itself, would not justify the reversal
of the Macharia Ruling, a decision which, as we must take
judicial notice, will have established itself as a mark
of certainty and predictability in the
law,... on the basis
of which numbers
of people will have figured out their rights and expectations.