Sentences with phrase «judicial immunity which»

We suggest that this rule is based in judicial immunity which was explained in Collins v. Brown, No. 2007 - CA -000847-MR (Ky..

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Adjudicator Immunity: The court also found, with respect to allegations against the statutory tribunal members, that judicial or adjudicator immunity, which applies to both judges and tribunal members, «prohibits lawsuits against courts and tribunals based on their actions as adjudicators» (paImmunity: The court also found, with respect to allegations against the statutory tribunal members, that judicial or adjudicator immunity, which applies to both judges and tribunal members, «prohibits lawsuits against courts and tribunals based on their actions as adjudicators» (paimmunity, which applies to both judges and tribunal members, «prohibits lawsuits against courts and tribunals based on their actions as adjudicators» (para. 61).

Judicial immunity, which generally provides a judge's personal assets can not be taken for an official judicial act, would be Judicial immunity, which generally provides a judge's personal assets can not be taken for an official judicial act, would be judicial act, would be removed.

Traditionally, such attempts have been roundly rebutted by invoking absolute judicial immunity, which protects those involved in proceedings (or in their preparation) from liability.

My tendered Amicus brief which was rejected by the Supreme Court was not to seek a vindication for Judge Bamberger, but to uphold the Doctrine of Judicial Immunity.

If the Supreme Court does not review this jurisdictional issue, then there will be established a precedent which will void the Doctrine of Judicial Immunity.

If the Judicial Immunity Doctrine is repealed, then the Supreme Court will have given unlimited license to the KBA to sanction any judicial officer for any ruling with which the KBA diJudicial Immunity Doctrine is repealed, then the Supreme Court will have given unlimited license to the KBA to sanction any judicial officer for any ruling with which the KBA dijudicial officer for any ruling with which the KBA disagrees.

(This is an unpublished decision but it cites several Kentucky and U.S. Supreme Court decisions which uphold the Doctrine of Judicial Immunity.)

As explained in the tendered brief (a copy of which is posted below) the judicial immunity rule applies even if the judge acted with malice.

If so, what does it intend to do to prevent the abuse of immunity rights and defend the EU citizens» and employees» rights and the community acquis in organisations such as EPO which while exercising judicial functions is at the same time breaching the European legal order rules?

Other government officials generally have only «qualified immunity» which means that they have liability if they intentionally violate clearly established law, which basically means that there is a binding judicial precedent governing the facts and circumstances at issue.

(b) Acts undertaken by a prosecutor in preparing for the initiation of judicial proceedings or for trial, and which occur in the course of his role as an advocate for the State, are entitled to the protections of absolute immunity.