Is the fact that the trial judge cuts and pastes 85 % of one party's closing written submissions into his judgment «cogent evidence» displacing the presumption of
judicial integrity which includes impartiality?
Not exact matches
All codes of
judicial conduct espouse the values of judicial independence, impartiality, integrity, diligence and competence, as evidenced by The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002), which was signed by the chief justices of 29 co
judicial conduct espouse the values of
judicial independence, impartiality, integrity, diligence and competence, as evidenced by The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002), which was signed by the chief justices of 29 co
judicial independence, impartiality,
integrity, diligence and competence, as evidenced by The Bangalore Principles of
Judicial Conduct (2002), which was signed by the chief justices of 29 co
Judicial Conduct (2002),
which was signed by the chief justices of 29 countries.
[27] The presumption of
judicial integrity and impartiality is a high one,
which can be rebutted only by cogent evidence.
During the General Assembly on January 21, 2012 actually expressed concerns over the
integrity of the
judicial system,
which they felt was an institution that «served the public,»
She's received many awards, including the Robert V. Payant Award for Teaching Excellence from the National
Judicial College,
which she received in 2016, and the Justinian Award for Professional Excellence by the Johnson County Bar Association, an award given annually to an attorney who exemplifies
integrity, service to the community, and service to the legal profession.
Preservation of the
integrity of the
judicial process means that jurors should only weigh that evidence
which is considered relevant to the case.
But it will also include a strong presumption of
judicial integrity, as well as the underlying social context through
which these statements, and this case, has come to the public light.