Sentences with phrase «judicial justice needs»

$ 300,000 is not worth wrecking her life, though judicial justice needs to be done in this case.

Not exact matches

Justice Kolawole after listening to both counsel, said that there is no need to speculate on the court proceedings since the judicial process requires the defendants to take their plea before there can be hearing on bail application.

Dissenting justice campaigners, legal aid lawyers and those who've witnessed the rot setting in (from swingeing legal aid cuts, curbs to judicial review, an interpreting service in freefall, probation chaos and threats to withdraw Britain from the Human Rights Act) will be highlighting the urgent need to halt the destruction of our justice system and abide by the principles of the medieval charter.

The Ministry of Justice plans to tighten the test that needs to be passed before a judicial review can be brought to challenge decisions by the Government and public bodies» — The Times (#)

«We will not stop working until the bright light of opportunity shines on all New Yorkers,» Cuomo said, emphasizing also the need for economic equity in the educational system, racial and economic justice in the judicial system and voter empowerment in the electoral system.

Maryan Daqal Xussen says while as an NGOs they have taken cases to court, notes that judiciary staff, «need training as sometimes it's not easy to get justice» and this could be coupled with an increased number of female judicial officers.

In 1996, Massachusetts Governor William Weld needed to appoint an associate justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court in the commonwealth.

Access to justice does not, says the court, displace the need for judicial oversight and restraint.

Justice Moldaver then turns to what is described as practical considerations for law enforcement and the administration of justice, at paras. 183 - 6, suggesting that (a) the disclosure of text messages received by a complainant could be challenged by a sender who is alleged to have abused the complainant and thus exposes vulnerable complainants such as children, people with mental disabilities and the elderly (b) the increased need for warrants could strain police and judicial resources in an overburdened criminal justice system and (c) at the trial stage, these repercussions could complicate and prolong proceedings where defendants have standing to challenge searches conducted against collateral targets in large prosecJustice Moldaver then turns to what is described as practical considerations for law enforcement and the administration of justice, at paras. 183 - 6, suggesting that (a) the disclosure of text messages received by a complainant could be challenged by a sender who is alleged to have abused the complainant and thus exposes vulnerable complainants such as children, people with mental disabilities and the elderly (b) the increased need for warrants could strain police and judicial resources in an overburdened criminal justice system and (c) at the trial stage, these repercussions could complicate and prolong proceedings where defendants have standing to challenge searches conducted against collateral targets in large prosecjustice, at paras. 183 - 6, suggesting that (a) the disclosure of text messages received by a complainant could be challenged by a sender who is alleged to have abused the complainant and thus exposes vulnerable complainants such as children, people with mental disabilities and the elderly (b) the increased need for warrants could strain police and judicial resources in an overburdened criminal justice system and (c) at the trial stage, these repercussions could complicate and prolong proceedings where defendants have standing to challenge searches conducted against collateral targets in large prosecjustice system and (c) at the trial stage, these repercussions could complicate and prolong proceedings where defendants have standing to challenge searches conducted against collateral targets in large prosecutions.

During 2003 I authored a paper entitled «Using Summation iBlaze in the Courtroom — Better Lawyer, Better Judge, Better Justice — The Need for Judicial Leadership» [PDF].

While it is routine for top judges to make speeches (for example in 2011 and in 2007) and judicial decisions reflecting the need for greater access to justice in Canada.

The rationale for judicial case management was a simple one: a shared need to provide better service at reduced cost to the public, by reducing delays and increasing the efficiency of the justice system.

«Despite the best efforts of former Chief Judges, there was little or no involvement of our judges in such areas as: financial management; operational decisions; the implementation of judicial support programs; the use of statistics and management information for assessing caseloads or judicial resource needs; or the day - to - day administrative needs of the judges and justices of the peace.»

Judicial independence is often justified, both in the decisions of the courts and in the broader public discourse, by the need to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.

Justice Brown found that the whether or not the court should exercise its discretion to hear a moot appeal, is guided by the following test: (i) whether the issues can be well and fully argued by parties who have a stake in the outcome; (ii) the concern for judicial economy; and (iii) the need for the court to remain alive to the proper limits of its law - making function in order to avoid intrusions into the role of the legislative branch.

You need pay nothing to access the front page of Judicial Reports, which features weekly, magazine - style articles reporting on the administration of justice in New York together with daily reviews of legal news.

But then each one would need to testify that unintelligible law was the proximate cause... or an expert opinion to that effect, which would need to come from inside the justice system itself — completely impossible as the freedom of information legislation does not cover judicial records, and you can not sue the court system (as far as I know).

Finally, although we do not have a justice of precedents, it is a fact that the volume of judicial disputes leads the Judges to create a base of decision criteria and it needs to be very well known by the law office to guarantee maximum performance in the defence of its clients.

The Canadian Bar Association's Envisioning Equal Justice consultation paper, Underexplored Alternatives for the Middle Class, recognizes the need to «re-engineer» dispute resolution processes and explores a number of court process reforms as potential means to provide better access to judicial dispute resolution.

Yet given the reality that Parliamentary conduct may not always be responsive to the needs of justice (at least not without judicial prompting), it might be queried if the anti-exceptionalism of Robinson's reasoning towards public authorities cuts off a prospective means for inducing legal innovation.

Given the important purpose of the judicial discipline process, the critical role of integrity in ensuring public confidence in the judiciary, and the need to ensure fairness to Justice Girouard, the Ministers agree that the best course of action is to jointly request, pursuant to s. 63 (1) of the Judges Act, that an inquiry be held into the findings of the majority of the Inquiry Committee that prompted it to recommend his removal.»

Oregon HB 2322 (2007) Provides Chief Justice may designate locations in the state for the sitting of circuit courts in the event of an emergency and that such locations designated need not be in the circuit court's judicial district.

And there is very much this sense, as one of the Court of Appeal judges in these cases put it, that reopening these cases would make our judicial system grind increasingly slowly, so the response to the fact that the judicial system is underfunded — needs more judges, needs more court time, needs more investment — is to say no to cases and to refuse to open cases rather than to fund the system more and the upshot of that of course, is a reduced access to justice.

Rigorous enforcement of this rule will not only protect respondents from incurring unrecoverable costs, but should positively contribute to access to justice by freeing up judicial and administrative resources that are so acutely needed to implement the «culture shift» mandated by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Chief Justice Roberts needs to carefully monitor the implementation of the judiciary's new reporting rules to ensure that these rules change judicial behavior — that the new sunlight actually disinfects the judiciary against the stain of corporate judicial lobbying.

Chief Justice Heather Forster Smith, of the Ontario Superior Court, said modern court administration and courtrooms are needed in order to make the judicial system more efficient.

Responding to Lord Justice Briggs» Civil Courts Structure Review, the ELA said that, while an online court may seem suitable for such claims at first glance, employment claims were «characterised by their complexity» and the «special nature» of the employee - employer relationship needed to be preserved where possible, with judicial power exercised sensitively.

Lawyers who are interested need to be mentored into position to make their applications in such a way that recommendation to the Minister of Justice by the judicial advisory committee is virtually a certitude.

Ensuring the Healthy Development of Foster Children: A Guide for Judges, Advocates and Child Welfare Professionals (PDF - 2,430 KB) New York State Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children (1999) Questions that should be asked by a judge, lawyer, legal guardian, or Court Appointed Special Advocate when reviewing cases of children in foster care to ensure that the child's health needs are being addressed.

Screenings and Assessments Used in the Juvenile Justice System: Evaluating Risks and Needs of Youth in the Juvenile Justice System (PDF - 394 KB) Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Center for Families, Children and the Courts (2011) Reviews screening and assessment instruments and summarizes issues related to instrument validation, selection, and administration.