In our contribution to Ars Aequi we reveal the Roman roots of the preliminary reference procedure, explain the inception and application of the instrument by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and discuss the potential of this new instrument for
judicial law making by the Dutch Supreme Court.
Not exact matches
Contract
law, for example, provides that by doing or saying certain things people can
make binding agreements with one another that will be enforced by
judicial authorities in the event that one or more parties fail to follow through on the agreement.
And in the crisis, emergency decisions were
made that have been effectively removed from
judicial review, including violations of state corporate
law and issues raised by the Constitution.
JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's review «The Forms Behind the
Laws» (April) begs fundamental questions of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode of
judicial interpretation that would, in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who
make decisions based on personal preference.
note: there are 3 types of OT
laws: a) ceremonial (ritual cleansing, sacrifices, etc. — required to be
made clean / holy) b)
judicial (
laws specifically for the nation state of Israel) c) moral
laws (the 10 commandments, etc..)
instead, ceremonial &
judicial laws are abrogated because Christ FULFILLS them (i.e., Christ has
made us clean as the ultimate sacrifice, so sacrifices wouldn't continue; in Christ, God will bring people from ALL nations to himself, not just Jews).
Second,
judicial review under the Constitution
makes possible the entry of natural
law theory into litigation.
Americans have a long history of changing the
laws we
make and as long as Muslims use only the American
judicial system to effect change, isn't that an example of their assimilation?
Our 1996 symposium on
judicial usurpation and subsequent articles were criticized for being alarmist; but the Florida Supreme Court changed many minds, and I now note that even worthies such as George Will are using the feared R - word, referring to the «regime» of lawless
law -
making by judges.
Though we
make every effort to preserve user privacy, we may need to disclose personal information when required by
law wherein we have a good - faith belief that such action is necessary to comply with a current
judicial proceeding, a court order or legal process served on our Web site.
The
law requires the
judicial branch to maintain information regarding jury services, including information for breastfeeding women about their ability to postpone jury service or request a reasonable accommodation be
made, on its website.
«The
judicial process, the
judicial system of Kenya and the election
laws themselves
make full and adequate provision for accountability in this election,» said Kerry, an election observer for the Carter Center.
Even if you can afford a
judicial review, reforms will
make it easier for public bodies to escape a full examination of whether or not they behaved in accordance with
law.
Frequently people think that there are only two ways address flexibility in a constitution: to legally entrench an entire document and to protect it with strong
judicial oversight, or to have a political constitution and a sovereign parliament, which, in the words of A.V. Dicey, «has... the right to
make or unmake any
law whatever....»
Judicial review underpins the rule of
law and is central to our constitutional
make - up, in which parliament sets out the
laws, public bodies implement them and courts
make sure that this implementation complies with the
law.
In all the other Cases before mentioned [within the
judicial power of the United States], the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to
Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall
make.»
The legslative creates it, the
judicial approves it if it's constitutional, and the executive enforces to
make sure people abide by the
law.
The
judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in
Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the
Laws of the United States, and Treaties
made, or which shall be
made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
The statement added, «The EFCC boss expressed concern over the delay usually experienced in dispensing corruption cases and the conspiracy (in some cases) between the criminals and
judicial workers /
law enforcement agents to
make violators of
law escape justice, citing the case of a former governor of Adamawa State, Bala Ngilari, who was set free with the connivance of a prison warder and court registrar after being convicted by court.»
If the Supreme Court wasn't functional for an extended period then various different and contradictory decisions
made by the appeals courts would build up and there would be different «
laws of the land» in each federal
judicial district.
The situation is
made worse by the epidemic, as described by Trump, of information leaking to the Press from the
judicial and
law enforcement agencies, from the intelligence community, from the legislature and from Trump's own administration.
«Public Officers
Law 87 (2)(e)(i) prohibits making available for public inspection and copying all records that would interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,» read a March 3 denial letter from Miner's corporation couns
Law 87 (2)(e)(i) prohibits
making available for public inspection and copying all records that would interfere with
law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,» read a March 3 denial letter from Miner's corporation couns
law enforcement investigations or
judicial proceedings,» read a March 3 denial letter from Miner's corporation counsel.
«In 2012 alone over 250
judicial opinions — more than double the number in 2007 — cited defendants arguing in some form or another that their «brains
made them do it,»» according to an analysis by Nita Farahany, a
law professor and director of Duke University's Initiative for Science and Society.
My job was to provide evidence - based research data to support policy
making in the
judicial council in the areas of family
law and juvenile delinquency and dependency court administration.
Presenting essays written by authorities in the fields of education, political science, and
law, West and Dunn highlight the many areas of education policy that have
made their way into U.S. courts to be debated and decided, and consider the implications of heightened
judicial involvement for schools...
That would mean that the documents like Constitution or Declaration of Human Rights would be interpreted differently in each case and lead to depending on the subjectivity of the court or the judge in individual matters and
make judicial assessment as the primer source of the
law.
The
Judicial Branch interprets
laws, apply
laws to cases and
make sure that current
laws are not violating the Constitution.
It is an achievement
made all the more remarkable by the dramatic expansion of the case
law in what Lord Bingham has described as the «huge, burgeoning field» of
judicial review.
As a matter of policy, it
makes sense to immunize judges in all their
judicial functions, even when a judge acts with malicious intent, University of Pittsburgh
law professor Arthur Hellman tells Jones.
Whatever the outcome it needs to be recognised that policy views of the extent to which courts and tribunals should be able to interfere with business decisions will determine whether any change in the
law,
judicial or legislative is
made.
These Court decisions
make new
law that are precedents in later
judicial reviews.
Properly restrained
judicial constitutional review accepts the primary
law -
making responsibility of legislatures by acknowledging the wide ambit of legislative choices available to elected officials».
That the bill presents a case for
judicial consideration arising under the
laws of the United States and treaties
made under their authority with the Cherokee Nation, and which
laws and treaties have been, and are threatened to be still further, violated by the
laws of the State of Georgia referred to in this opinion.
The Court of Appeals could, however, ask for the assignment of a retired judge to handle discovery issues, reviewing the evidence,
making proposed findings of fact and conclusions of
law, and perform «any other necessary related
judicial duties».
Volunteers attend the
judicial proceedings for drunk driving cases to
make sure that the
law is being enforced and prosecuted.
«The SJC has
made new
law in holding that, yes, in fact, attorneys can be liable [for their negligence] even when there's contributing
judicial error,» Ms. Deluhery told the publication.
He has lectured in Canada and abroad on diverse legal topics, and has published on such subjects as
judicial decision -
making, Canada - US trade, the
law of evidence and constitutional
law.
Citing the Canadian
Judicial Council's «Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons», the Court went on to
make a ruling that included an explanation of
law and in particular procedure and limitations.
In order to perform their duty effectively, lawyers research on
laws, the intent of those
laws and the
judicial decisions that are relevant to their client's circumstance so as to
make a knowledgeable decision.
The Library of Congress explains that, as a civil
law country, Chinese judges
make rulings based on statutes without deference to other court decisions — unlike the U.S. common
law system, which is based on
judicial interpretations.
I identify, among a host of examples, the way in which Professor Zander handles the quality and length of modern legislation and the process by which it comes to be enacted in the form which it finally takes: the admissibility in argument involving statutory interpretation of reference to Hansard and the Parliamentary debates: the personal element in
judicial law -
making, and the «so called» rules of statutory interpretation: and diversity on the
judicial bench.
I often watch senior judges» hearings, and learn from them all the time; being continuously updated in the
judicial idea, business knowledge, documents and other professional knowledge ensures that the trial results conform to the
law of intention and
make impartial final judgments.
Companies,
law firms, lawyers and individuals have to go through a large number of case
laws and
judicial decisions to identify or retrieve information necessary to support legal decision -
making or finding something relevant to their case.
And that perhaps is why its doctrines demand such strict servility to the
law; it is in the duty for the strict and correct application of legal doctrine that the key to
judicial accountability lies, as I think the comments earlier this year of Mr. Justice David Stratas
made clear (succinctly described and linked here: https://doubleaspectblog.wordpress.com/2016/01/15/taking-doctrine-seriously/).
If the United Kingdom, having already triggered Article 50 TEU,
make a unilateral attempt to revoke this notice, and this exercise of prerogative power were submitted to
judicial review before the UK courts, then a substantive interpretation of EU
law would be necessary to determine the question in the case.
In the case of the CFSP the national courts replace the CJEU and have to ensure effective
judicial protection of individuals also in the absence of the Court's competence to
make preliminary rulings and monopoly to annul EU
law (AG view, para 102).
«I am pleased to announce the nomination of Mr. Justice Nadon, whose extraordinary body of legal work — as a longtime judge on both the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal;
judicial member of the Competition Tribunal; expert in maritime and transportation
law with almost 20 years as a practicing member of the Barreau du Québec; arbitrator; teacher; and author —
makes him an ideal candidate for the Supreme Court of Canada.»
Two questions arose: (i) whether s 204 contained an express requirement under which the county court was required by an enactment to
make a decision applying the principles that were applied by the court on an application for
judicial review, thus placing s 204 appeals within the public
law category; and (ii) if not, whether there were any other reasons requiring the application of
judicial review principles with the result that s 204 appeals fell within the post-LASPO 2012 civil legal aid regime.
We still teach you the underlying principles of
law and
make you read
judicial decisions about the application of these principles to various to legal problems — and we still don't give you the opportunity to apply those principles yourselves.
I was recently introduced to one of Canada's Military Judges, learning that there are only four such
judicial officers, which
made me realize how little I know not simply about military
law but also about the very structure of the military justice system.