Moreover, in holding that a statute prohibiting aliens from being imported for labor was not intended to prevent a church from hiring a foreign Christian minister, the Court quoted approvingly from two previous
judicial opinions showing «we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity» and «the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.»
Not exact matches
Actual snapshots of the brain from MRIs or CT scans are only
showing up in about 15 percent of
judicial opinions that involve neuroscience, according to Farahany's research.
For example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in
judicial opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber»
shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used by parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944 by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before them.
The project aims to make
judicial elections more transparent for journalists and researchers by creating online profiles of judges that
show campaign contributions,
judicial opinions and biographies.
Another tab within the profile
shows any
judicial opinions that discuss the expert, with a snippet of relevant text and a link to the
opinion's full text.
Public
opinion polls consistently
show that voters know very little about judges and
judicial candidates on the ballot and wish they had more information.
Recognizing good and bad legal writing, which includes
showing them legal writing other than appellate
judicial opinions;
I must have read too many Judge Posner
opinions before starting my
judicial clerkship for a judge serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, because early on I added into a draft
opinion a passage that would have ordered an attorney to
show cause for violating an important rule.