In many cases,
judicial positions require election or appointment by a political official, so it's essential to have a resume that can impress influential decision - makers.
Not exact matches
(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each
judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such
position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such
position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such
position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be
required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).
However, while tempting, this
position may overstate the intensity of the
judicial review
required.
Nonetheless, as this Court has consistently said, the integrity of our
judicial system
requires that the trial judge's privileged
position in assessing the facts be respected.
The outcome of a case may suffer if a retired judge who is acting as counsel is
required to argue a
position that is contrary to his or her
judicial decisions.
As a result, federal court judges have a stronger personal incentive to grant summary judgment than some of their state court counterparts.93 Finally, federal courts have more resources at their disposal than state courts and are therefore in a better
position to invest the significant
judicial resources often
required to decide a motion for summary judgment.94
The Court took as its starting point the proposition that the statutory safeguards in PACE were sufficient to protect the rights of citizens [29 - 30] and that the independent
judicial scrutiny
required under PACE were adequate to safeguard the
position of persons affected.
This
requires those in
positions of influence and those with relevant experience in the legal profession, whether on the bench or in practice, to proactively seek out junior lawyers with «
judicial potential» and to provide them with such mentorship.
Similarly, Art 2 did not
require a change in the established
position regarding
judicial review of a decision not to prosecute.
Although some
Judicial Assistant
positions require previous work experience, individuals can enter this occupation with only a high school diploma on their resumes.
The
judicial field is ever changing and the
position requires a lot of training for remaining updated.