Sentences with phrase «judicial procedures as»

Not exact matches

In the Old Testament not cruelty but well - considered judicial procedure, based on blood - brotherhood, was responsible for the wholesale destruction of a family in punishment for the sin of a single member of it, as in the case of Achan.

Its reliance on legislative and judicial procedures to decide a complex theological, moral, and ecclesial matter has only heightened even more the disagreement while minimizing the possibility of serious, sustained engagement on basic issues such as theological anthropology, justification and sanctification, the nature of sin, repentance and forgiveness, Scriptural authority, and the nature and purpose of ordained ministry.

The secular tendency to see naming either as a diagnostic procedure or a judicial investigation acts like a vacuum, removing the thick layers of human interconnectedness.

So long as the death penalty exists, there are certain to be others, for every judicial procedure — however meticulous, however compassed about with safeguards — must be carried out by fallible human beings.

Word spread Friday evening of a potential deal that could have also included ethics - related measures such as more oversight of procurement procedures — a discussion sparked by the latest public corruption scandal that reached into the governor's inner circle — and a public financing system for judicial campaigns.

According to the Speaker, the violation of processes and procedure as spelt out by the constitution and judicial code of conduct, through the judge's partisan and emotional disposition on the allegations raised «against the government she is serving, has shown her as unfit for the bench».

Public participation (described as access to information and judicial remedy, as well as participation in decision making) in development projects not only has legal precedent in international accords but also has been incorporated into the procedures of international lending organizations.

While the goals of LA&W are similar to those of legal writing classes taught at many schools — to teach students to understand, analyze, and apply legal authority and to communicate the results of that analysis in writing — the course also contains some components that are influenced by its Legal Methods roots, as well as some that may or may not be taught in a first - semester civil procedure class: a focus on judicial methods, an introduction to legal institutions and processes, and instruction on the anatomy of a civil law suit, the timeline of a civil case, and the link between procedural and substantive law.30 The full set of course goals was outlined in the 2000 Report and has remained unchanged:

Today is a banner day for sane discussion of the medical procedure known as abortion, thanks to a plethora of articles in Tuesday's newspapers and Web sites that put the issue into legal, social and judicial context.

This procedure must therefore be open for all questions capable of submission for judicial consideration, either by the court of justice or possible by national courts, in so far as such questions give rise to doubt either as to the substantive or formal validity of the agreement with regard to the treaty.

«Judicial hellholes» generally are defined as «places where judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally against defendants in civil lawsuits.»

Any order of the Oklahoma Supreme Court modifying or repealing any provision of the Code of Judicial Conduct as it exists on the effective date of this act, or enacting a revision to the Code of Judicial Conduct as it exists on the effective date of this act, shall be submitted to the Legislature for its review as and in the manner that agency rules are submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act.

In the U.K., the Office for Judicial Complaints, established in 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investJudicial Complaints, established in 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investjudicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investigation.

Following several years of judicial procedures, the Austrian Supreme Court made a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice on two issues, of which the most interesting one concerns whether the environmental impact assessment also serves to protect an individual against pecuniary damages as a result of the decrease in the value of his or her property.

A foreclosure sale under a Deed of Trust does not have to follow the same procedures as a judicial foreclosure, which requires stricter parameters and a higher level of accountability; no judicial supervision is required for a foreclosure sale under a Deed of Trust in most states.

The court decided to review Issues 2, 3, 5 and 6 on a «deferential standard of reasonableness,» but applied correctness to Issues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correctness.

Jim has served as an instructor at the Federal Judicial Center's annual «New Judges Workshop» since 1990, educating newly - appointed federal judges on all aspects of federal procedure.

This session looks at how international judicial co-operation and recognition issues will be managed, including issues relating to any transitional period, as well as the future recognition of the European Arrest Warrant and amendments to UK and EU extradition procedures?

In the literature, scholars have thus concluded that the setting of judicial remedies in the EEA is incomplete for the EFTA countries, as there is no binding preliminary reference procedure which would ensure one unitary authoritative interpretation of EEA law (see S. Magnússon, «On the Authority of Advisory Opinions», 13 Europarättslig tidskrift (2010) p. 528 at p. 535 - 536).

In a concise Decision [2] delivered on 21st November, a Labour Court held that the new judicial fees are contrary to EU law and, consequently, the Labour Court could decline to declare procedures brought by citizens who have not paid the fees as inadmissible.

SB 440 Amends or repeals approximately 70 statutes related to Judicial Branch operations including matters such as the appointment, compensation, duties, and qualifications of Judicial Branch personnel; the treatment of records, papers, and documents held by the Judicial Branch; the powers, duties, and selection of judges and justices; the delegation of certain roles and activities within the Judicial Branch; and budgeting procedures for district courts.

However, the recently enacted Sapin II law provides for a DPA procedure limited to corruption and «probity offences», known as a judicial public interest agreement.

In this specific area, which is the compensation of personal injury cases, theoretical knowledge is indispensable, and it requires the mastery of technical questions such as the methods of forensic and pecuniary evaluation of a personal injury, the processes of compensation (procedures and judicial remedies), and third - party redress.

Walker says political leadership, internal procedures, media oversight, and public pressure are all necessary to ensure civil liberties, but that judicial oversight is extremely important as well, and that Scalia misused his scholarship to imply that Walker supports a diminishing role for the courts.

These include courtroom procedure, the judicial officer himself or herself and other participants (whether present in the courtroom or not), such as criminal defendants, civil litigants, lawyers, court staff, witnesses, juries, government agencies, the media and observers.

While many courts are expanding the number and nature of non-adversarial dispute resolution services available, such as the family cases conferences provided by the Provincial Court of British Columbia or the judicial dispute resolution hearings available in the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, adversarial procedures remain the dominant feature of the litigation process.

Such protective measures should, as appropriate, include effective procedures for the establishment of social programmes to provide necessary support for the child and for those who have the care of the child, as well as for other forms of prevention and for identification, reporting, referral, investigation, treatment and follow - up of instances of child maltreatment described heretofore, and, as appropriate, for judicial involvement.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the foregoing enabling act and to the matters recited in the foregoing preface, that the annexed rules be and the same hereby are adopted for the regulation of original and appellate civil practice and procedure in judicial proceedings in the district courts of the State of Nevada, and the forms annexed thereto approved; that the same shall be effective on January 1, 1953; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district judges and district attorneys), and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than sixty days prior to January 1, 1953, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of said rules in accordance with the provisions of said enabling act.

As the judicial process moves forward, I continue to have complete confidence in our crime lab personnel and procedures.»

This approach provides the individual with protections and places the burden on the parties to resolve their differences about the appropriateness and scope of disclosure as part of the judicial or administrative procedure itself before the order is issued, rather than requiring the covered entity to get involved in evaluating the merits of the dispute in order to determine whether or not the particular request is appropriate or too broad.

A court may not recognize a foreign - country judgment if: the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law, as determined by the court using standards developed by the American Law Institute and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law to govern resolution of transnational disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Rules of Civil Procedure: These rules govern the procedure in courts of record in all actions, suits, or other judicial proceedings of a civil nature whether cognizable as cases at law or in equity, with the qualifications and exceptions stated in Rule 81.

Lord Rodger agrees with Bingham that «it is not open to this House in its judicial capacity to make such a far - reaching inroad into the common law rights of a defendant as would be involved in endorsing the procedure adopted in the present case» and that rather this task is for Parliament to address, as, «the proper body both to decide whether such a change is now required, and, if so, to devise an appropriate system which still ensures a fair trial».

The decision of the EAT under Underhill J in YMCA Training v Stewart [2006] UKEAT 332/06, [2006] All ER (D) 69 (Dec) can be seen as continuing the non-technical, «low hurdle» and (frankly) hostile judicial approach to the statutory procedures in the Employment Act 2002, and also as giving first consideration to the relationship between the statutory disciplinary procedure and an employer's own (more comprehensive) procedures.

While the particular issue should not now recur since as from 1 October 2007 a National Framework for NHS Continuing Health Care And NHS - Funded Nursing Care (the NHS National Framework) requires local authorities and PCTs to agree a dispute resolution procedure which would not in the first instance require proceedings in court, the case nevertheless does provide some valuable insight into the scope of judicial review and the legal and constitutional standing of PCTs, in relation to local social services authorities.

Over the past year I've written about the Emoluments Clause; the No Religious Tests clause; limits on presidential power as defined in the steel seizure case; the meaning of the oath of office; how the Appropriations Clause constrains lawsuit settlements involving the federal government; how and whether gerrymandering by race and for partisan advantage affects constitutional rights; judicial independence; the decline and fall of the Contracts Clause; the application of Obergefell to issues of public employees and birth certificates; Article V procedure for calling a new constitutional convention; and too many First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment controversies to list.

Although doubtlessly supportive of the (strictly dualistic) arguments of the Italian Constitutional Court, the Committee understands the vindication of ICCs through domestic judicial mechanisms as a decentralized enforcement procedure upholding fundamental international norms.

In the US Marbury v. Madison was a case that at the time attracted little attention as the subject matter related to respect of procedures in judicial appointments.

Professional Experience High Court of Gujarat (Gujarat, India) 10/1998 — 5/1999 Junior Clerk • Managed all mail correspondence as well as all document filing systems, maintaining an accurate register of all information flow while working closely with the computer operator with the government facility • Assisted various operational aspects of the judicial and administrative departments, performing numerous critical clerical functions to facilitate efficient operations and service execution • Applied relevant knowledge of related legal procedures with respect to document control and records maintenance • Aided management with various other duties as assigned

(b) Collaborative law is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage dispute on an agreed basis without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.

Collaborative Divorce is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage disputes on an agreed basis without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.

The majority of Court held the procedure provided for resulted in the position of the Federal Court Judge not being an independent one but rather «a position equivalent to that of a ministerial adviser» [43] and that this compromised «public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary as institution or in the capacity of the individual judge to perform his or her judicial functions with integrity».

Professor Schepard has written many articles about divorce, child custody law, procedure and mediation of child custody disputes, as well as other aspects of judicial administration.

Regarding the 30 - day suspension, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated «judicial review of disciplinary proceedings of a voluntary association should be limited to determining only whether the member disciplined received procedural due process as required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and whether the association has conducted its inquiry in accordance with its own rules of procedure.»

RECO countered by asking the court to reject Luzak's appeal, on the grounds that the council had not exercised a «statutory power of decision» as determined by the Statutory Powers Procedures Act and therefore was not subject to the court's judicial review.