Sentences with phrase «judicial resource issues»

The nature and extent of the case management provided by a judge or case management master under this Rule in respect of a proceeding shall be informed by any relevant practices, traditions, customs or judicial resource issues that apply locally in the region in which the proceeding is commenced or to which it is transferred.

Not exact matches

«Here, because it is undisputed that the RFPs and contracts at issue were separate, this court should dismiss this case now rather than waste judicial resources on a trial,» Miller wrote the judge last Tuesday.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Apart from the issue of garnering sufficient resources, administrative courts face a more compelling hurdle — fighting the battle for judicial independence.

It is also a waste of time and judicial resources because a trial court could have dealt with the issue when it heard the case, causing further delay.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Tennessee injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Missouri injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a California injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

On the website of the Judicial Branch of Georgia you can find useful Self - Help Resources, including information on family law issues (called domestic relations on the website).

Numerous reports from judicial staff and other access to justice resources cite family law issues as one of the most prevalent legal matters experienced by low income Tennesseans.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a North Carolina injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The evolving case law on judicial assistance to SRLs and other related issues is now being tracked by the NSRLP, and upon completion will be published as a new resource.

«To argue issues unnecessarily wastes precious judicial resources, does not advance the administration of justice and spends counsel's time incurring unnecessary costs.»

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a foreign injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Interesting case with lots of issues for society, our profession and the (mis) use of scarce judicial resources...

There are no special circumstances in this case that justify the use of scarce judicial resources to resolve the appeal: it will not have a practical effect on the rights of the parties; it does not entail an important issue that might independently evade review or of which a resolution is in the public interest; and the appeal is not of jurisprudential importance.

Fostering Court Improvement Fostering Results, ABA Center on Children and the Law, National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues, & Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic (2008) Aims to link States so that they can open new, collaborative dialog with all stakeholders in their child welfare systems through the use of data and data analysis, including Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System data housed and maintained by the child and family services agency of each State.

Sample Memorandum of Understanding: Court - Agency Cooperation on Child Family Service Reviews (CFSRs)(PDF - 94 KB) National Child Welfare Resource Center for Legal and Judicial Issues (2005) Sample memorandum of understanding for court / agency cooperation in the CFSR process.

Agency and Court Collaboration on the CFSRs and PIPs National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues (2002) Survey of 13 States to identify methods for increasing collaboration between child welfare agencies and family courts during the Child and Family Services Review process.

Ensuring Educational Rights and Stability for Foster Youth: California Assembly Bill 490: Training and Implementation Package National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues, California Youth Connection, Children's Law Center of Los Angeles, & National Center for Youth Law (2003) Provides information on the California Assembly Bill 490, a law designed to ensure all pupils in foster care have a meaningful opportunity to meet State achievement standards.

National Resource Center for Special Needs Adoptions National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues

Fostering Court Improvement Children and Family Resource Center, Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic, Fostering Results, & National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues Gives States an efficient mechanism for sharing data between dependency courts and child welfare agencies so they can more effectively manage systems.

Permanency Through Collaboration Between Delinquency and Dependency Courts (PDF - 880 KB) National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues, ABA Center on Children and the Law Child CourtWorks, 10 (2), 2008 Describes efforts in Idaho to bridge the gap between child welfare and juvenile justice proceedings to assist youth with cases pending simultaneously in both systems.

Some Sample Court Improvement Themes and Strategies to Consider Addressing in a PIP (PDF - 48 KB) National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues (2007) Summarizes potential legal - judicial themes and strategies to address during the CFSR process, including delays in the legal process, improved legal representation, foster parent involvement, concurrent planning, and judicial perfJudicial Issues (2007) Summarizes potential legal - judicial themes and strategies to address during the CFSR process, including delays in the legal process, improved legal representation, foster parent involvement, concurrent planning, and judicial perfjudicial themes and strategies to address during the CFSR process, including delays in the legal process, improved legal representation, foster parent involvement, concurrent planning, and judicial perfjudicial performance.

Fostering Results, ABA Center on Children and the Law, National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues, & Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic (2008)

Improving Outcomes Together: Court and Child Welfare Collaboration (PDF - 280 KB) Children and Family Research Center & National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues (2005) Explores the ways juvenile and family courts and child welfare agencies share data and information and collaborate outside the courtroom in order to improve outcomes for children in their care.

Engaging Courts and Building Court / Agency Collaboration [Teleconference] National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement & National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues (2007) Discusses the Court Improvement Program (CIP) role in enhancing court / agency collaboration and presents the experiences of experts in child abuse and neglect cases who have worked with courts and agencies to enhance collaboration and to increase court participation in the CFSR process.