It is also a waste of time and
judicial resources because a trial court could have dealt with the issue when it heard the case, causing further delay.
Not exact matches
The request wasn't filed in an attempt to delay proceedings, but was filed
because the government was considering filing a petition to enforce the John Doe summons (essentially a separate court proceeding), thus «sparing the Court's
judicial resources and the Parties» time and expense.»
«Here,
because it is undisputed that the RFPs and contracts at issue were separate, this court should dismiss this case now rather than waste
judicial resources on a trial,» Miller wrote the judge last Tuesday.
The Maine Supreme
Judicial Court ruled recently that the 16 - turbine Bowers Mountain wind farm can not be built
because of its unacceptably negative impact on Maine's scenic
resources.
On the basis of this case study if
judicial review is not available, either in law; or
because F does not have the knowledge or
resources to fund an application; or if there can be no challenge to the Commission figure at the liability order stage, then F will be fixed with a sealed court document which, on the above facts, represents an unchallengeable misrepresentation of the true facts.
Because my focus was on the craft of drafting an opinion primarily for courses on
judicial opinion writing, I leaned toward «how - to»
resources.
Concluding the two trustees were «unable to work together in any reasonable and effective way,» Justice D.M. Brown said the competing sides «can not reasonably expect that unlimited
judicial resources are available to devote to their internecine quarrels,» adding (with apparent frustration)(i) that the Commercial List in Toronto is «chronically short of judges,» (ii) that the «scheduling of criminal trials -LSB-...] has become particularly problematic»
because it is «manifestly under
resourced» and (iii) that «dates for one day civil motions are now being given out 8 to 9 months down the road.»
Far too often, those with limited
resources feel closed off from the
judicial system
because they do not know their rights and can not afford attorneys.
Because the government has a legitimate interest in conserving prosecutorial and
judicial resources in districts with large numbers of immigration cases, and fast - track programs are rationally related to that interest, we conclude that the PROTECT Act's authorization of these programs, and their implementation in some but not all districts, does not violate Appellants» equal protection and due process rights.
Because I am located in Massachusetts, I thought I'd try a simple task of finding
resources for the cases of our highest court, the Supreme
Judicial Court.
Largely
because of the administrative and financial control that the Court had over its
resources (under its MOU with the Attorney General), the Ontario Court of Justice has been able over the years to leverage its expertise in
judicial education to benefit not only the NJI but also judges and courts across Canada.
Private standing has traditionally been viewed as the best way to operate our justice system
because: it prevents mere «busybodies» from using up scarce
judicial resources; it ensures contending points of view are raised by those personally invested in the case; and it preserves the proper role of courts and their relationship to the other branches of government.
Ford maintains that abstention is appropriate
because the Boone Circuit Court exercised its jurisdiction first and, therefore, the current federal proceedings involve «piecemeal litigation that amounts to an unnecessary waste of
judicial resources.»
In outlining its reasons, the Court stated that «the class action is designed to facilitate authors» access to justice while preserving
judicial resources and, where appropriate, to effectively sanction acts that would otherwise remain protected from
judicial intervention
because of the low level of injury when assessed on an individual basis.
Mediation is increasingly popular in divorce cases
because it helps to minimize conflict, prevents the waste of
judicial resources, and can help couples come to mutual agreements that are tolerable to both parties.