Legal Aid Ontario's ongoing support of a case that a judge found to be «meritless» amounted to an abuse of process that wasted
judicial resources meant for low - income Ontarians.
Legal Aid's ongoing support of Worrod, he ruled, amounted to an abuse of process that undermined the public interest and wasted
judicial resources meant for low - income Ontarians.
In a landmark decision, an Ontario judge has ruled that Legal Aid's ongoing support of Kathleen Anne Worrod was an «abuse of process» that undermined the public interest and wasted precious
judicial resources meant for low - income Ontarians.
Not exact matches
The Quebec Ministry of Justice, describes the non-
judicial process as a
means of «of dealing with certain offences in a particular way so as to better rationalize the use of
resources allocated to the
judicial system and not to unduly stigmatize the misconduct of an offender whose behaviour does not warrant
judicial action.»
Of course, all of the above takes a conscious plan and some money, which
means allocating valuable
resources that might otherwise be devoted to something else in budget - conscious
judicial systems.
Rather, the
judicial system contemplated by the Code of Ethics is intended to complement and supplement the
judicial resources of the state and provide an alternative
means of dispute resolution that is cheaper, swifter, and as fair, or, perhaps, even fairer.