Not exact matches
The second preliminary reference (Watson)
arose before the Court of Appeal in the context of
applications for
judicial review of the UK's Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) on the grounds that this Act was incompatible with the EU Charter and the ECHR.
He has extensive experience of employment related disputes concerning health professionals, including the
application of MHPS, and of
judicial review challenges
arising out of such cases.
Two questions
arose: (i) whether s 204 contained an express requirement under which the county court was required by an enactment to make a decision applying the principles that were applied by the court on an
application for
judicial review, thus placing s 204 appeals within the public law category; and (ii) if not, whether there were any other reasons requiring the
application of
judicial review principles with the result that s 204 appeals fell within the post-LASPO 2012 civil legal aid regime.
Holmcroft's
application for
judicial review arose out of concerns held by Holmcroft that KPMG (as independent reviewer) and Barclays Bank PLC (the bank which sold the IRHPs to Holmcroft) had not given proper consideration to Holmcroft's claim for consequential losses.
Covers a range of environmental issues
arising in farming and fisheries contexts such as the
application of the precautionary principle to the ecosystem of the mid-Atlantic ridge but is also involved in
judicial review of EU directives in the field of the environment.
(a) where the essential character of the dispute involves an academic matter, the superior court will demonstrate institutional deference and defer its jurisdiction to the university, except of course on an
application for
judicial review of the matters
arising from the university's own academic appeal processes;
Cranston J held that Al Rawi v Security Service [2011] UKSC 24, [2012] 1 AC 531 had no
application to the
judicial review of search warrants as the common law right to information does not
arise fro consideration [39].
A similar contradiction
arises as a result of the requirement under the Supreme Court Act 1981, s 31 (1) that in order to bring a
judicial review, a party must have «sufficient interest in the matter to which the
application relates».