He has experience in bringing
judicial review claims against local authorities and other public bodies and is committed to acting for extremely vulnerable children or adult clients with specialist needs.
Under s 38,
any judicial review claim against the minister or a member of the inquiry panel, must be brought within 14 days of the day on which the applicant became aware of the decision.
a judicial review claim against a university alleging erroneous marking of an exam, and loss of exam scripts.
Not exact matches
The Supreme
Judicial Court
reviewed the legislative history of each statute and concluded that the two - year statute of limitations period of G.L. c. 161A, § 38, governs all personal injury
claims against the MBTA, including those involving a defect in a public way.
This
claim for
judicial review was brought
against the Secretary of State for Health, acting by the Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency (the MHRA).
I assist clients with issues that arise during bid preparation, and I represent clients in public procurement disputes
against governments at all levels (bid challenges,
judicial review, civil
claims for breach of «contract A / B», etc.).
As a pupil, Zac was also involved in: R (on the application of RWE Generation UK Plc) v Gas and Electricity Markets Authority [2016] 1 CMLR 17, a challenge
against a decision modifying the charges imposed on users of the National Grid (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); Speed Medical Examination Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 3585, a
judicial review challenging reforms to the process for handling whiplash
claims (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); and an application for interim relief by a company that had been redesignated under a European Union sanctions regime (as a pupil assisting Maya Lester).
Most recently, Rachel has been appointed to act as Special Advocate for one of the Claimants in
judicial review proceedings brought
against the Secretary of State for Defence and the Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by three Afghan nationals
claiming that they worked for the Defendants in Afghanistan as covert human intelligence sources.
Described by Chambers & Partners as «A high - profile team deserving of all its praise», our Actions
Against the Police, Civil Liberties and Human Rights team specialises in
claims for false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution, discrimination, deaths in custody, and the
judicial review of decisions taken by public authorities.
Of general interest is that findings
against Government in
Judicial Review proceedings may not automatically be relied upon to found similar civil
claims for compensation depending on the way the administrative court has considered the issue.
Fiona's dispute resolution specialisms include arbitrations, contract and tort disputes, statutory compensation
claims, shareholder disputes, partnership and LLP disputes, warranty and completion account disputes,
judicial reviews, public enquiries, injunctions, supplier disputes, fraud, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and professional negligence
claims against a broad range of professionals and contentious probate and trust disputes.
Joanne appears regularly in the High Court in South Wales and Bristol defending
claims for
judicial review brought
against government departments.
Charles acts in
judicial review claims and advisory work both for and
against public bodies in areas such as immigration, prisons, hospitals, mental health and community care, and was on the Attorney General's A Panel for 5 years before taking silk.
She brought a
claim for
judicial review against the refusal of her marriage application.
Brendan has regularly advised insurers on whether the FSO has correctly taken jurisdiction over complaints
against financial services providers, dealing also with limitation issues and
claims for
judicial review.