Both are classified as questions of law (the former as one of jurisdiction), and hence are matters for a reviewing court to resolve on a «correctness» basis under Australia's
judicial review framework.
I wonder whether it is possible or wise to adopt only parts of the Dunsmuir approach while retaining most other aspects of the traditional
judicial review framework.
Not exact matches
The Ministry of Defence is facing a
Judicial Review over the framework of support it provides to service personnel facing judicial
Judicial Review over the
framework of support it provides to service personnel facing
judicial judicial process.
The Ministry of Defence is facing a
Judicial Review over the
framework of support it provides to service personnel...
In cases where disputes have arisen between Canada and First Nations in these areas, the lack of a legislative
framework has led some judges to question whether
judicial review is even available.
Is the
review really the same: (a) when exercised by an administrative authority, in the
framework of EIA, and (b) when exercised by a
judicial authority in the assessment of «causal link»?
Acting for the Government in current
judicial review proceedings challenging the compatibility of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and the legal
framework for governmental surveillance powers generally with human rights.
However, because Ktunaxa Nation is a
judicial review of an administrative decision, the justificatory analysis occurs under an administrative law approach under the Doré
framework where the standard of
review is reasonableness.