Sentences with phrase «judicial review of decisions of»

Three recent decisions address the issue of registrants of colleges being entitled to anonymity while seeking judicial review of decisions of the Health Professions Review Board («the Board»).

The Court undertook a judicial review of the decision of the AHRC.

Acting in a judicial review of a decision of an Independent Reviewer (appointed under section 166 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) to the effect that the redress offered to a client in respect of a mis - sold financial...

In the first action, the Law Society brought a claim seeking judicial review of the decision of the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to seek offers from firms of solicitors and not - for - profit organisations on the basis of the new unified contract.

R (Bhandari) v Croydon LBC (Unreported, Admin Ct): B & C applied for judicial review of the decision of the Council's independent appeal panel that C was liable to refund it the full cost of residential care that had been provided to her between 2014 and 2015.

R (Teva B.V.) v Secretary of State for Health [2018] EWHC 228 (Admin) Biogen Idec Ltd was an interested party Overview On 13 February 2018, the High Court (Jay J) dismissed the application of Teva BV («Teva») for judicial review of the decision of the UK's Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency («MHRA») not to -LSB-...]

This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the Immigration Appeal Division («IAD») to refuse the Applicant A.B.'s appeal to sponsor her parents due to her father's medical inadmissibility for excessive demand on health services.

In Canada (Attorney General) v. Bodnar, the employer sought judicial review of a decision of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (Board) in which the Board held that the inclusion of disability - related absences and absences taken for the purposes of family caregiver leave in an attendance management policy was discriminatory.

The Government of Canada filed a judicial review of the decision of the Canadian Human Rights Commission to refer the complaint to the Tribunal.

The applicants applied for judicial review of the decision of the respondent School Board to close the school.

Since the Human Rights Act 1998 many cases involving freedom of expression have been decided as judicial reviews of decisions of public authorities.

Members of 5RB are also involved in judicial reviews of decisions of the Press Complaints Commission and the other media regulators.

R (Boehringer - Ingelheim Ltd) v NHS England (2016, Administrative Court) Resisting an application for permission to apply for judicial review of a decision of NHS England on the circumstances in which an end of life cancer treatment should be used

In the first significant judicial review of a decision of the BC Health Professions Review Board (the «HPRB»), the BC Supreme Court found that a registrar investigating a complaint and exercising a summary dismissal power under s. 32 (3) of the Health Professions Act (the «Act») was entitled to deference as to adequacy of the investigation in Moore v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, 2013 BCSC 2081.

Not exact matches

A judicial review («JR») is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body; they are a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the conclusion reached.

And in the crisis, emergency decisions were made that have been effectively removed from judicial review, including violations of state corporate law and issues raised by the Constitution.

Those earlier tariff cases gave US importers and other interested persons an opportunity to argue whether such added duties are justified and an opportunity to seek judicial review of agency decisions.

Various judicial review and appeal applications have been launched with respect to both the JRP Report and the decision of the Governor in Council.

Section 54 of NEBA provides that the cabinet decision is amenable to judicial review (not the appeal with leave mechanism):

JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's review «The Forms Behind the Laws» (April) begs fundamental questions of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode of judicial interpretation that would, in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who make decisions based on personal preference.

The importance of the second and third issues is obvious for decisions about a written constitution, which later was interpreted as involving judicial review of acts of Congress, and for a federal union of states having partial autonomy under a national government.

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

The ACCC had 28 days in which to apply for judicial review of the decision, but such a review would not test the merits of the Tribunal's decision.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has decided that it will not apply for judicial review of the decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal to grant conditional authorisation to AGL Energy Limited's (AGL) proposed acquisition of Macquarie Generation.

The ACCC has announced it will not apply for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision to grant conditional authorisation for AGL's proposed acquisition of Macquarie generation.

The ACCC has applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal's recent Tabcorp / Tatts merger authorisation decision.

An appeal on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation decisions, but the ACCC is seeking judicial review, alleging three reviewable errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that «it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening of competition».

Read the OSA's decision: https://humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/AD2410The-London-Oratory-Hammersmith-Fulham-28August13.docx Read the BHA's previous press release on the OSA decision: https://humanism.org.uk/2013/08/29/schools-adjudicator-london-oratory-school-must-overhaul-admissions-criteria-after-bha-complaint/ Read the BHA's press release on the threat of judicial review: https://humanism.org.uk/2013/11/05/london-oratory-school-challenges-schools-adjudicators-decision-must-rewrite-admissions-policy/ Read more about the BHA's campaigns work on «faith» schools: http://www.humanism.org.uk/campaigns/religion-and-schools/faith-schools View the BHA's table of types of school with a religious character: http://www.humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/schools-with-a-religious-character.pdf The British Humanist Association is the national charity working on behalf of non-religious people who seek to live ethical and fulfilling lives on the basis of reason and humanity.

Ms Smith constantly gave way to MPs on various aspects of the bill, including compensation for those who are not charged after being held for 28 days, the definition of what constitutes «grave and exceptional» circumstances and why she has avoided judicial review of the decision.

This completely misses the point of judicial review, which is that it is designed to stop bad decision - making.

Last year he singled out planning judicial review by saying cases must be brought within six weeks of any decision rather than the usual three months, knowing it is harder for small community groups to raise money and start complex proceedings in this short space of time.

A judicial review of a decision to approve two state - funded, highly selective Catholic schools will be heard at the High Court on 15 and 16 November.

Perhaps the minister should look at the quality of decision - making in his own department and its agencies before seeking to limit judicial review.

Top of the pops this week was a piece on the Liberal Democrat decision to support the Conservatives in dismantling judicial review.

Judicial review is used by individuals, businesses and organisations to test the lawfulness of government decisions and actions, from those of ministers to local authorities.

The NASUWT has today received formal notification from the High Court of the hearing date for its application for judicial review of the Coalition Government's decision to change the index - linking of public service workers» pensions, including teachers» pensions, from the Retail Price Index (RPI) to Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Plans for two new state - funded Catholic schools with discriminatory admissions policies have cleared a further hurdle today, after Mr Justice Sales in the High Court dismissed a judicial review of Richmond - upon - Thames council's decision to approve them.

An Accra High Court presided by Justice Ackah Boafo has in a judicial review quashed the decision by the lands and natural resources ministry to revoke the mining license of Exton Cubic Group Limited, owned by Ibrahim Mahama.

The Ghana Revenue Authority is a statutory establishment whose actions and decisions are subject to judicial review by the High Court of Ghana.

The manufacturers of donepezil, Eisai and Pfizer, have said they may call for a judicial review of the decision.

May started the review of the medical evidence once she came to office and the decision prompted a pause into the judicial review of previous home secretary Alan Johnson, who decided to extradite.

Woolas responded by saying he would seek a judicial review of the decision, arguing through a statement issued by his solicitor that the ruling would «inevitably chill political speech».

The DWP decided to appeal against the decision and around the same time the Carmichaels» separate application for a judicial review of the underlying legislation was dismissed in the high court.

The Ministry of Justice plans to tighten the test that needs to be passed before a judicial review can be brought to challenge decisions by the Government and public bodies» — The Times (#)

The commission told the Good Law Project that its fresh investigation was «commenced after internal consideration of the papers while responding to a judicial review initiated by the Good Law Project of the decision not to investigate following the original assessments».

A year later members of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a bill that would strip federal protections from wolves in the Great Lakes region and Wyoming with language preventing any further judicial review — overruling two court decisions finding that the Fish and Wildlife Service had wrongly removed Endangered Species Act protections for the wolf.

The Humanist Society Scotland (HSS) is seeking a judicial review of the Scottish government's decision to not allow young people to opt - out and claims that it may have acted unlawfully.

Campaign group Comprehensive Future had previously said it was seeking advice on the feasibility of a judicial review of the decision in the High Court, but has delayed plans due to a lack of information.

Margaret Tulloch of Comprehensive Future, a group which campaigns for equality of opportunity in education, confirmed they were taking advice on the feasibility of a judicial review of the decision in the High Court.

The decisions of public bodies, such as the Secretary of State (and therefore of RSCs where they assume the powers of the Secretary of State), local authorities and schools can be challenged by way of judicial review and other appropriate proceedings in the High Court.