Civil rights campaigners Liberty said it will seek
a judicial review of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (DRIP) Act on behalf of two MPs, David Davis and Tom Watson.
Not exact matches
Such benefits require governments to bring scientists into their agencies and departments, use their peer -
reviewed data and analyses to inform policymaking and evaluations — approaches that also should be extended to the legislative and
judicial branches
of government, she said.
The second preliminary reference (Watson) arose before the Court
of Appeal in the context
of applications for
judicial review of the UK's
Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) on the grounds that this Act was incompatible with the EU Charter and the ECHR.
MPs David Davis and Tom Watson have succeeded in their
judicial review challenging the
data retention powers in section 1 of DRIPA — the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2
data retention powers in section 1
of DRIPA — the
Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2
Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014.
Of more interest to data protection specialists, the Judge ruled that if he had found a breach of the DPA 1998, he would not have refused relief on the grounds that the C could have brought an ordinary Part 7 claim for breach of the Act, rather than an application for judicial revie
Of more interest to
data protection specialists, the Judge ruled that if he had found a breach
of the DPA 1998, he would not have refused relief on the grounds that the C could have brought an ordinary Part 7 claim for breach of the Act, rather than an application for judicial revie
of the DPA 1998, he would not have refused relief on the grounds that the C could have brought an ordinary Part 7 claim for breach
of the Act, rather than an application for judicial revie
of the Act, rather than an application for
judicial review.
The European Court and Actions for Annulment: Codebook for
Data Set on Actions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of Just
Data Set on Actions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The
data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of Just
data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the
judicial review of the legality
of Community acts — filed with the European Court
of Justice.
In October 2017, the Commercial Court dismissed a
judicial review application which sought to quash An Bord Pleanala's decision to grant the Apple technology company planning permission for the construction
of a
data storage centre together with an electricity substation and associated infrastructure on a site near Athenry, County Galway.
R (Hussain) v Secretary
of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 1111 The interrelationship between the
Data Protection Act 1998 and
judicial review.
Also check out Paul Caron's
review of U.S. News Law School Rankings for
Judicial Clerkships, which includes
data from Brian Leiter's rankings.
* Introduction to the firm's expectations, internal processes (submitting memos for
review, etc.); * creating and recording a research plan / trail; research guides; organizing your research; * library resources and library tour; * intranet (ben.net) searching intranet and internet searching; tips and cautions; * organization, analysis and writing
of BJ memos; * corporate precedents:
data bank, and searching
of; * Canadian Abridgement & CED: print and electronic version: searching (Carswell's rep does this); * MLB index system: using, searching online * internal memo bank: how it's indexed; how to search; * how to search periodical databases; * BJ oil & gas precedents: use
of and searching; * how to do client specific research, analysis and memoranda; * research, writing
of quantum memos; * QL databases, pricing and searching; * Statute research: finding, updating,
judicial consideration (librarians teach this).
Each level
of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform for the
judicial review of arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and
data analysis
of cases regarding applications to confirm the validity
of an arbitation agreement, cases regarding applications to cancel or enforce arbitration awards
of our domestic arbitration institutions, applications to recognize and enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region arbitration awards, cases regarding applications to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards, and cases relating to the
judicial review of arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and others relating to the confirmation
of the validity
of an arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee
of the correct application
of law and
of a unified yardstick for
judicial decision - making.
They are also responsible for
reviewing and processing documents, keypunch
data into the court's system and give or take delivery
of information for
judicial officers.