Sentences with phrase «judicial reviews of decisions before»

The adjudicator appointed under the Canada Code agreed with him but reserved judgment regarding remedy when AECL sought judicial review of the decision before the Federal Court.

Not exact matches

Perhaps the minister should look at the quality of decision - making in his own department and its agencies before seeking to limit judicial review.

The Ministry of Justice plans to tighten the test that needs to be passed before a judicial review can be brought to challenge decisions by the Government and public bodies» — The Times (#)

The alliance is hoping for an early decision from the court on whether to allow a judicial review of the case which they hope could take place before the new year.

We also represent employers before all levels of courts in wrongful dismissal actions, occupational health and safety matters, judicial reviews of decisions made by administrative tribunals and to obtain injunctive relief.

In this case, the ECJ first examined the compatibility of the ECJ's judicial review of Commission inspection decisions with Articles 8 and Article 6 (1) ECHR before reaching the conclusion that there was no violation of Articles 7 and 47 of the Charter (Case C - 583 / 13 P, Deutsche Bahn and others v. Commission, EU: C: 2015:404, paras. 32 - 36 and 46 - 48).

Our lawyers have acted for architects, engineers, lawyers, dentists, and accountants in professional errors and omissions claims, advised clients before professional regulatory bodies, acted for professional administrative bodies, provided advice regarding investigations conducted by administrative authorities, and have acted in judicial reviews of decisions made by professional regulatory bodies.

Simplified, one could conclude that while the negative decision as regards the petition's admissibility is subject to full judicial review of the EU judge, any subsequent decision in regard of a positive petition can not be challenged before the EU courts, regardless of how the Parliament addresses the petition.

The university did not allow the students to appeal the decision to the Board of Governors Discipline Appeal Committee, thereby preventing them from exhausting all internal remedies before seeking judicial review.

Sally Robertson: appeared before the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) and advised on a potential judicial review in respect of a decision of the general Pharmaceutical Council.

Daphne Romney QC: instructed in a judicial review of a decision by the National College for Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) to bar a headteacher for misuse of public funds; also representing a pharmacist at an eight - day hearing before the General Pharmaceutical Council late 2015.

(Judicial review of BSB decision to prosecute a Barrister; «sponsor» Barrister failed to advise BSB Complaints Committee of professional context of Barrister's actions; Committee did not read Barrister's full response to complaint before deciding to prosecute him; failure of due process.)

Represented the United States Trade Representative (USTR) as respondent in a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal brought by the applicants to question the decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal in an antidumping and subsidy case where the tribunal held, in favour of the USTR, that there was no injury to the applicants.

Although appellant Penn Central had opposed the designation before the Commission, it did not seek judicial review of the final designation decision.

[1] This is an application by a student and his parents for judicial review of a decision to expel the student after he admitted to smoking marijuana in a friend's dormitory room the night before the final day of his sixth and final year at Appleby College («Appleby»).

Shortly before the consultation date on November 28, 2013, I was advised that the College had received a letter suggesting that an application for judicial review would be made of a ratio review panel decision that I had chaired (which had issued over 6 months ago), on the basis of «a reasonable apprehension of bias».

The university did not allow the students to appeal the decision to the Board of Governors Discipline Appeal Committee, thereby preventing them from exhausting all internal remedies before seeking judicial review... [more]

It strikes down the right of the Workers» Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT) to reconsider its own decisions on the basis of jurisdictional error, and it potentially broadens the scope of judicial review, to permit reviewing judges to re-weigh the evidence that was before the tribunal.

In 2012 - 2014, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation before the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel, and in 2015 - 2016, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipReview Panel, and in 2015 - 2016, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipreview before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipeline.

The EHRC has power to participate in human rights cases before the courts and to seek judicial review of decisions raising human rights issues, but the legacy of history will encourage the new commissioners to keep equality as the dominant focus of its activity.