NJ Gov. Chris Christie called the DOMA decision «just another example of
judicial supremacy rather than having a government run by the people we actually vote for.»
Not exact matches
Even if legitimate, moreover,
judicial supremacy inhibits,
rather than promotes, general moral discourse about community values and aspirations.
Rather, I suggested that there may exist a category of statutory provisions — including provisions permitting the executive branch to override
judicial decisions — that are «so constitutionally egregious as to test the courts» commitment to the absolute
supremacy of Parliament».
With its surprising subsequent history taught as part of the case, Cooper works better as a demonstration of how complex the constitutional system can be,
rather than as a demonstration of the
supremacy of
judicial interpretation.