In an article carrying the headline, «
the junk bond rout that was» t,» the paper reports:
Not exact matches
The NY Times aptly reflects the consensus view that there has really been no, «
rout,» in the market for
junk bonds and that they don't signal anything more serious for other markets or the economy, as they don't represent a, «systemic risk.»
Bloomberg, though, has an entirely different take, claiming, «The
rout in
junk bonds is intensifying and there's blood in the water.»
Bonds suffered in September, buffeted both by a jump in rates, which hurt Treasuries and high - grade corporates, and by a rout in junk b
Bonds suffered in September, buffeted both by a jump in rates, which hurt Treasuries and high - grade corporates, and by a
rout in
junk bondsbonds.