Sentences with phrase «junk science because»

I said that the CRU results should be treated as junk science because they have refused to release their data and code.

But I have an expertise, I would say, in reading science and spotting junk science because that's what I do with most of my time.

Not exact matches

You should not assume that just because a study is peer - reviewed and appears in a respected scientific journal, that it is «junk science.»

Unfortunately the public policy science is often identified a «junk» because it isn't research science and this prevents it from being accepted in the courts.

You can not bring yourself to admit that that paper is junk science at its worst... because you agree with it.

Often justified largely on the basis of junk science they have come up with such wonderful policy prescriptions as using only unreliable sources of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs of their customers, all in the name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy use, and teaching school children junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis of science.

It's also a fools errand for skeptics to invest too much in the «Pause» either because it is validating junk science observations as it is criticizing them.

Junk Science is calling BS on Obama's claim today that his daughter Malia is a victim of global warming, having suffered an asthma attack in pre-school because of it.

We can't call it junk science, science fiction, or even scientific fantasy, because no science is involved.

So true... Fear of global warming has been great for academia and the Left from the beginning because it, «makes industry and capitalism look bad while affording endless visuals of animals and third - world humans suffering at the hands of wealthy Westerners,» as Van Dyke noticed, plus: «Best of all, being driven by junk - science that easily metamorphoses as required, it appeared to be endlessly self - sustaining.»

This means the KT97 and variations is junk science, because it has excluded the real heating mechanism of Earth's land and oceans.

If you want to read more about this, I recommend not just my book, but also Matt Ridley's superb The Rational Optimist or anything by Julian Simon (known as the Doomslayer because of the way he constantly confounded Neo Malthusian pessimism and junk science).

You try what was seen in an award - winning essay suggestion from the 2008 «Roscoe Hogan Environmental Law Essay Contest,» that such testimony may be ignored because it is unreliable junk science funded by corporations that's irrelevant in the face of settled science.

It is not how we are using the Nuclear Power Plants that we have, it is how we are not building the ones we need because of junk CO2 science.

Just because the scaremongering is wrapped up in a scientific cloak, that doesn't make it any less junk science.

Climate science is a mess and more of a junk science than a science now, exactly because of views held by people like Mosher.

The global warming scare is dying because the science behind it is just junk.

He calls these bodies of research «junk science,» primarily because they are based on human health data, which is confidential due to privacy laws.

These standards will prevent Wisconsin state courts from being bogged down with cases based on «junk science,» and will discourage cases of questionable merit from being brought in Wisconsin because of weaker expert opinion evidence standards.

I would like to do just that — tell the truth and correct the record, because the opinion by legislators Barto and Yee was laden with revisionist history, misstatements of legal fact, and most important, non-medical junk science.