(Just last week, Alley Cat Allies delivered more than 55,000 signatures to the Smithsonian Institution in response to the publication earlier this year of agenda - driven
junk science produced by researchers at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.)
Not exact matches
I should point out, however, that funding further study with the likes of the the hockey team seems to be a complete waste, since it seems to
produce results ranging from bias confirmation, at best, to
junk science, to outright corruption.
The snake oil salesman will not accept
science that says his product is worthless, nor will the climate scientists accept that they are using
junk science to
produce fear mongering.
Or perhaps the
science of climate change (which has been the most politically manipulated
science in living memory), will finally be based on literature that encompasses all view points, rather than just the «fast and convenient» 97 %
junk literature currently being mass
produced at an unprecedented rate.
The problem is, climate deniers are the ones earning a living from
producing junk science.
«Its ten pages of text are filled with gems of
junk science, which are summed up in this ridiculous pontification: «Long - term changes in climate will
produce more extreme weather events and put greater stress on critical Earth systems like oceans, freshwater, and biodiversity.
Mosher, I guess CW is thinking that academic freedom from the constraints of any risk whatsoever in
producing junk science enables innovative thinking to flourish that would not otherwise evolve.