Sentences with phrase «junk science so»

The Debunkosaurus ™ is JunkScience.com's online guide and reference manual for debunking junk science so remember to check there for the information you need.

While President Bush's recent public statements seem to indicate that he may also be falling for global warming junk science so far, he's only for voluntary cuts in greenhouse gas emissions as well as «technology - based solutions.

Not exact matches

Equally for you christians your junk creation science makes you look foolish so please abandon that.

Many so - called cures for women's bloating and indigestion, from juice cleanses to specialty diets, are based on junk science.

oh dear, so much junk science... i wonder if you understand these things yourself?

Is Junk Science Tribune, and my journey to the girls in Buderim, Queensland on Facebook; Follow So I in Victoria, - Free classified ads California.

So while the teachers keep barking up the tree that the teacher evaluations are junk science, when will the teachers speak up with the same loud voice in regards to the personal and private data that is being stolen from our kids within Smarter Balanced Assessments and included in CT's Statewide Longitudinal Data Base, and shared with 3rd party vendors without parental consent?

I wouldnt take my dogs off TOTW but if price is a concern, this is the same price as junk Science Diet and Iams so youre much better off with the 4Health for the money.

This is a wonderful post and much needed in the blogosphere debate with the junk science experts — thanks so much!

Please post a list of the supposed benefits of global warming (GW which you also defend does not exist)-- it is so much fun to debunk junk science.

Prominent global warming advocates Michael Mann and Tom Wigley then tried to smear Soon as hard as they could so he wouldn't publish, reports Junk Science

We don't need another ice age.Forget all the junk science by so - called experts that are all in on the multi-billion dollar «climate research scam».

You so called (climate) scientists are just pushing dangerous political agenda based on junk science and on flawed & formally invalidated models.

The folks who claim that climate science is «junk science» and that is has been «politicized» do so all the time.

So should I call your «denier» stance «junk conspiracy science» even though we agree on the warming issue?

so, I guess my explanations referring to the scientific status of knowledge helps a bit to understand why Holmes» claim is a hoax and to prevents public from junk - science distributed by climate deniers.

[12] They also set out to challenge the World Health Organization (WHO) and decry health and environmental activism based on so - called junk science, especially where it related to environmental tobacco smoke, or ETS, and the possibilities of climate change through air pollution.

There is clearly now so much junk in the body of climate science literature relied upon by the IPCC that only rigorous examination of their inputs, methods and results would have any hope of establishing the veracity of their conclusions.

So to Michael Mann Lennart Bengtsson is now «junk science»?

So true... Fear of global warming has been great for academia and the Left from the beginning because it, «makes industry and capitalism look bad while affording endless visuals of animals and third - world humans suffering at the hands of wealthy Westerners,» as Van Dyke noticed, plus: «Best of all, being driven by junk - science that easily metamorphoses as required, it appeared to be endlessly self - sustaining.»

So it is JUNK - science — nothing more.

Well, fine: so were lots of people back then, despite the setback their junk - science philosophy experienced with the end of Nazi Germany.

But he made the mistake of, ah, seeking to expand his circle of climate acquaintances, and so Mann was forced to sneeringly dismiss him as «junk science».

So far, all we have is junk science, wrt «climate change,» «global warming,» and even «warming due to addition of GHGs.»

So the «average 78 joules for evaporation» meme is complete junk science.

Projections of (say) seawater levels or mean temperatures a century hence without so much as a standard deviation analysis are junk science.

He has a young son, so this is most unfortunate as he has an excellent bully pulpit, but uses it for giving voice to the most amazing junk science.

These people are feeding junk science to the public so that people will be scared and give them money so they can do more junk science.

I am so fed up of this AGW junk science being taught to our children, they are incapable of understanding and will become incapable of creating real science knowledge as in this example.