Objective and
juridical means lack the human reality of the papal unity.
If we can not see beyond
the juridical meaning of religious freedom to the freedom that the truth itself gives, how then can we expect to exercise this more fundamental freedom when our juridical freedom is denied?
(This mentains the very definition of the people or
the juridical meaning of the term «people».)
Not exact matches
But if by «capitalism» is
meant a system in which freedom in the economic sector is not circumscribed within a strong
juridical framework which places it at the service of freedom in its totality, and which sees it as a particular aspect of that freedom, the core of which is ethical and religious, then the reply is certainly negative.
Could this be because these
means are primarily objective and
juridical?
Bultmann is right enough when he observes that «it is not a
juridical concept... it does not
mean the remission of punishment».
In intention, whatever the
juridical overtones, the prohibition
means to suppress any and all «witness» that constitutes false testimony against the neighbor, and the depreciation, even destruction, of his reputation.
Using dishonesty as the
means to create a
juridical distinction between forms of anti-competitive behaviour has failed and so BIS's rethink is justified.