One of these projects has me immersed in the sexual assault laws of England and Wales, and in the course of doing some research in this area, I have learned that judges here routinely warn
juries in sexual assault trials of the need to dispel any myths and stereotypes that they may bring in to the adjudication process.
Not exact matches
After a six - day
trial and a «hopelessly deadlocked»
jury, the judge declared a mistrial
in the prosecution of comedian Bill Cosby for the alleged
sexual assault of Andrea Constand.
Regina v. V.D. (2008) Client found not guilty of
sexual assault,
sexual interference and invitation to
sexual touching after a five day
jury trial in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
Regina v. S.N. (2011) Client found not guilty of two counts of
assault and two counts of
sexual assault (Domestic related charges) after a 7 day
jury trial in the Superior Court
in Toronto.
However, these instructions are organized around categories of
sexual offences (
sexual interference, incest,
sexual assault, etc) and do not contain any specific directions cautioning
juries about the operation of myths and stereotypes
in trials of
sexual offences.
The
trial in New Haven had several factors that can aggravate jurors» stress: multiple victims including children,
sexual assault, graphic evidence and — as a capital case — the responsibility of deciding whether a defendant should live or die,
jury scholar Valerie Hans said.