In the Federal litigation scheme, the party asserting Federal court jurisdiction bears the burden of proving subject matter
jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.
Not exact matches
It is defined differently in different states and
jurisdictions, however, most
jurisdiction, including California define the civil lawsuit proof standard as «
by a
preponderance of the
evidence» for most types
of claims and, the slightly higher standard
of «clear and convincing
evidence» for claims for punitive damages (damages meant to punish the defendant rather than just compensate the victim).
I can also argue
by analogy to the
preponderance of evidence floor set not only in federal law, but also in the law
of the sister
jurisdictions of Maryland and the District
of Columbia (but watch out for hostility
by some judges towards those
jurisdictions, to the extent they might view Maryland and D.C. law as too lenient for criminal defendants).