«Data from 17 unified and general
jurisdiction courts indicate that automobile accident litigation generally comprises the majority of tort caseloads, with proportions ranging from 18 to 69 percent.»
Not exact matches
You acknowledge and agree that this terms of service agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Missouri, excluding conflict of laws provisions thereof that would
indicate the application of the laws of any other
jurisdiction and you hereby submit to exclusive
jurisdiction in the federal and state
courts of Missouri.
In response to the mother's application, the father filed a Notice of Constitutional Question
indicating his intention to challenge the
jurisdiction of the
court and the applicability of the Family Law Act to the dispute.
The case law
indicates that the merging of the Small Claims
Court into the Ontario Court (General Division) in the 1990s did not invest the provincially appointed court with s. 96 powers (Domtar Commercial Roofing and Insulation v. Exeter Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., 1993 CanLII 5563 (ON SC)-RRB-, and it is likely that only federal legislation could do so since s. 96 courts had jurisdiction over copyright matters in
Court into the Ontario
Court (General Division) in the 1990s did not invest the provincially appointed court with s. 96 powers (Domtar Commercial Roofing and Insulation v. Exeter Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., 1993 CanLII 5563 (ON SC)-RRB-, and it is likely that only federal legislation could do so since s. 96 courts had jurisdiction over copyright matters in
Court (General Division) in the 1990s did not invest the provincially appointed
court with s. 96 powers (Domtar Commercial Roofing and Insulation v. Exeter Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., 1993 CanLII 5563 (ON SC)-RRB-, and it is likely that only federal legislation could do so since s. 96 courts had jurisdiction over copyright matters in
court with s. 96 powers (Domtar Commercial Roofing and Insulation v. Exeter Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., 1993 CanLII 5563 (ON SC)-RRB-, and it is likely that only federal legislation could do so since s. 96
courts had
jurisdiction over copyright matters in 1867.
A more difficult example, by the way, is citations to the old Quebec volumes of the Recueils de jurisprudence du Québec, where the standard abbreviations reflect the level of
court without expressly
indicating the
jurisdiction (e.g. C.S., Cour supérieure; C.A., Cour d'appel, B.R., Cour du Banc de la Reine, etc.).
The
Court of Cassation is also as - signed the task of establishing
jurisdiction (
indicates, when you create a conflict between the or - dinary
courts and the special, Ital - ian or foreign ones, which has the power to treat the cause) and the competence (to resolve a conflict between two lower
courts).
Judge Schechter held that the state in which the first proceeding was filed should normally assume
jurisdiction, since DRL § 76 - e
indicates that a
court may not exercise
jurisdiction if «at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concerning the custody of the child has been commenced in a
court of another state having
jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this article, unless the proceeding has been terminated or is stayed by the
court of the other state.»
In the present matter, the fact the Trial Judge retained
jurisdiction and
indicated he would conduct a review in January, 2017 (if necessary) was noteworthy for the
Court of Appeal (see para. 7).
For example, the Federal
Court in Murphy v. Compagnie Amway Canada noted that both parties relied on Seidel, but distinguished that case from it by pointing to a long string of case law
indicating Canada is an arbitrary - friendly
jurisdiction.
Challenges to
jurisdiction must be made as early as possible in cases involving exclusive
jurisdiction agreements, the
Court of Appeal has
indicated.
In this view of the matter and for the reasons that we have
indicated, we have come to the conclusion that this
Court has no
jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an international commercial award of an arbitral tribunal constituted by the Refined Sugar Association, London.
We interpret the footnote to the
Court of Appeals opinion in this case, where
jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship, to
indicate its view that... the appeal could not be decided without reaching the constitutional question.»
On 22 September 2017, District Judge Jackson struck out the application
indicating that the
Court did not have an inherent
jurisdiction and also that the application was «incomprehensible» and «without merit».
Your citation will
indicate the county /
court information for the
jurisdiction where you were cited.
In addition to asking the
court for a temporary parenting plan, you can also
indicate on this form if you want the
court to enter a temporary injunction prohibiting both of you from permanently removing the children from the
court's
jurisdiction.