The President can pardon crimes under federal jurisdiction, what could prevent a pardon for a crime «committed in the United States» would be if someone committed crimes that also / exclusively falls under
the jurisdiction of a particular state.
Not exact matches
Follow - up or individualized responses to consumers in a
particular state by Alliance in the rendering
of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with
jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable
state exemption.
Jurisdiction: This service is not targeted to users in a particular locality, nor is it intended to constitute the doing of business in any jurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation of business anywhere on behalf of Fertility Center of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any jurisdiction outside of the Stat
Jurisdiction: This service is not targeted to users in a
particular locality, nor is it intended to constitute the doing
of business in any
jurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation of business anywhere on behalf of Fertility Center of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any jurisdiction outside of the Stat
jurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation
of business anywhere on behalf
of Fertility Center
of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any
jurisdiction outside of the Stat
jurisdiction outside
of the
State of Nevada.
In the
particular mentioned example
of federal vs.
state (vs. local) minimum wages, the most restrictive (highest) minimum wage in a given
jurisdiction would apply.
Follow - up or individualized responses to consumers in a
particular state by HCM in the rendering
of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with
jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable
state exemption.
Follow - up or individualized responses to consumers in a
particular state by Alliance in the rendering
of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with
jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable
state exemption.
Click on a
particular state to see Tribes with a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) with the Department
of Veterans Affairs, and contact information for the Regional Loan Center
of jurisdiction.
Should the referring court find that, according to the
particular values
of the legal order
of the Member
State in which it has
jurisdiction, offences such as those committed by Mr I. pose a direct threat to the calm and physical security
of the population, that should not necessarily lead to the expulsion
of the person concerned.
Until recently general
jurisdiction over a defendant (i.e.
jurisdiction over any lawsuit against a defendant without regard to the
particular facts
of the case) was present in any
state where a company has a permanent office for the conduct of business, under half a century of precedent on the issue that traced back to a U.S. Supreme Court case known as International Shoe v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1
state where a company has a permanent office for the conduct
of business, under half a century
of precedent on the issue that traced back to a U.S. Supreme Court case known as International Shoe v.
State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1
State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).
If the parties, one or more
of who is domiciled in a Member
State, have agreed that a court or the courts
of a Member
State are to have
jurisdiction to settle any disputes which have arisen or which may arise in connection with a
particular legal relationship, that court or those courts shall have
jurisdiction.
District court: A court
of the federal government or
of a
state, having
jurisdiction over a
particular geographic area.
The Court
of Appeal has
jurisdiction, in very
particular circumstances, to pursue a point
of general importance in an immigration case not raised below, in order to ensure the
state's compliance with its international obligations.
In
particular, a
State may exclude compulsory
jurisdiction with respect to «disputes concerning the interpretation or application
of articles 15, 74 and 83 relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles».
And when we view this object in conjunction with the declaration, «that no
state shall pass a law impairing the obligation
of contracts,» we shall probably think that this object points, in a
particular manner, to the
jurisdiction of the court over the several
states.
Where the child has his or her habitual residence in the territory
of a third
State which is not a contracting party to the Hague Convention
of 19 October 1996 on
jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect
of parental responsibility and measures for the protection
of children,
jurisdiction under this Article shall be deemed to be in the child's interest, in
particular if it is found impossible to hold proceedings in the third
State in question.
If a court has issued an order on non-return pursuant to Article 13
of the 1980 Hague Convention, the court must immediately either directly or through its central authority, transmit a copy
of the court order on non-return and
of the relevant documents, in
particular a transcript
of the hearings before the court, to the court with
jurisdiction or central authority in the Member
State where the child was habitually resident immediately before the wrongful removal or retention, as determined by national law.
The inference which necessarily results is that the Constitution ordained and established by those people, and, still closely to apply the case, in
particular by the people
of Georgia, could vest
jurisdiction or judicial power over those
states and over the
State of Georgia in
particular.
This study focuses on the
particular concerns
of rural
jurisdictions in meeting the challenges
of pro se litigation, examining 25 pro se assistance programs serving rural or predominantly rural
jurisdictions across 17
states.
By way
of example only (and not by limitation), if the parties do not agree on whether a
particular Dispute is subject to arbitration under this arbitration agreement, the proper tribunal to decide such Dispute is the United
States District Court (for the appropriate district, as provided above) or, absent subject matter
jurisdiction in that United
States District Court, in the appropriate
state court (as described above).
There are times when you want to know who the head
of state / government / power is in a
particular jurisdiction, and for those times Rulers is the site you need.
After setting out the
jurisdiction to make such an order and the enumerated factors that are to be considered, the court went on to consider some recent policy considerations and in
particular the 2014 Supreme Court
of Canada decision
of Hryniak v. Mauldin in which the SCC
stated that the conventional trial no longer reflects the modern reality and needs to be readjusted.
This very varied evidentiary legislation situation, will produce a very inconsistent caselaw, one
jurisdiction to the next, once judges and lawyers realize the consequences in law required by the fundamental difference between an electronic record and a pre-electronic paper record — in
particular, the «system integrity concept» that is expressly
stated in the electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1)
of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1)
of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence
of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. 22, 2013).
Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for
particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer
stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside
jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number
of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number
of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any
particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise
of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.
In addition, 4autoinsurancequote.com does not represent or warrant that: (i) the operation
of the Site will be error - free or uninterrupted; (ii) defects will be corrected; (iii) the Site, any emails sent by 4autoinsurancequote.com, or the server that makes the Site available are free
of viruses or other harmful devices; (iv) the Site will be available to you or that you will qualify for products or services offered; (v) the materials in the Site will be accurate as
of any
particular date; or (vi) the products or services offered through the Site are available outside
of the United
States or in
jurisdictions in which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licensed.
(1) Subject to this section, if, under the law
of a participating
State or a participating Territory, a court is empowered (whether generally or in
particular cases) to make a community service order in respect
of a person convicted
of an offence against the law
of the
State or Territory, a court exercising
jurisdiction in the
State or Territory may, under paragraph 70NFB (2)(a) make a community service order.
Your expert Tampa child custody attorney can advise you how each
of the fifty
states has passed exactly the same law with regard to which
state has
jurisdiction over child custody cases depending upon the contacts
of the parents and the child with each
particular state.