Sentences with phrase «jurisdiction of an administrative tribunal»

The issue was within the jurisdiction of an administrative tribunal.

Not exact matches

decided in a copyright case that one had to look at a real and substantial connection between the defendants and the jurisdiction of the court — or administrative tribunal — but not at where the server happened to be.

The Court decided that (a) the process of surcharging by administrative bodies engaged the criminal part of Article 6 and (b) the Austrian courts hearing appeals against the surcharges did not have the jurisdiction to carry out a «full review» of the decision to surcharge; only that way could one turn the combination of administrative decision and court decision into a decision by a «tribunal» complying with Article 6.

Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Limited Partnership et al. v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) 2013 NBCA 34 Administrative Law — Jurisdiction of particular boards and tribunals — Energy and utility boards

It held that, with rare exceptions, administrative tribunals with the authority to decide questions of law, are courts of competent jurisdiction within the meaning of s. 24 (1) of the Charter and can grant Charter remedies in in the course of carrying out their statutory mandates.

Supreme Court of Canada confirms that administrative tribunals with the authority to decide questions of law are courts of competent jurisdiction under s. 24 of the Charter.

The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that administrative tribunals with the authority to decide questions of law are courts of competent jurisdiction under s. 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

To the extent that a court rule or other law of this jurisdiction requires a lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction to obtain admission pro hac vice before appearing before a tribunal or administrative agency, this Rule requires the lawyer to obtain that authority.

[9] Lawyers not admitted to practice generally in a jurisdiction may be authorized by law or order of a tribunal or an administrative agency to appear before the tribunal or agency.

Therefore, the principles of statutory interpretation are critical when determining the jurisdiction of an administrative body or tribunal.

More specifically, they are seeking declarations that Québec could not, consistently with section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867, grant its provincial court exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases where the amount at issue is more than $ 10 000 or any powers of judicial review over provincial administrative tribunals, because these powers are reserved for federally - appointed judges.

They do not, in other words, interfere with these courts» jurisdiction as it had been understood in the s. 96 jurisprudence, which has always been concerned with the removal of types of cases (e.g. judicial review of administrative tribunals) from the superior courts» purview.