Not exact matches
«I observe with particular pleasure the view you have taken
of the immunity
of Religion from civil
jurisdiction, in every
case where it does not trespass on private rights or the public peace.
The Committee recommends that the
jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court be extended to enable it to deal with Misuse
of Market Power (s. 46 and s. 46A
where cases rely upon s. 83), Contravention
of Industry Codes (s. 51AD) and Unconscionable Conduct (Part IVA).
The court
of appeals handles all appeals except those in the supreme court's exclusive
jurisdiction: challenges to the validity
of a United States statute or treaty, the validity
of a state constitutional provision or statute,
cases requiring construction
of revenue laws, the title to state office and
cases where the death penalty is imposed.
«
Where the Court
of Appeal lacks the necessary
jurisdiction, in the first place, to hear and determine the appeal before it, such as in the instant
case, no decision
of the court against the competent appeal lies to this court.
I have no idea
where the CJ would get the authority not just to reach down and expedite a pending appeal but to order that
cases in varying states
of disarray (and maybe some have not even been filed yet) resolved at the trial level and the first appellate level and brought up to the Court
of Appeals, IF the top court even has
jurisdiction over each distinct dispute, within a fixed time.
It is primarily concerned with the
jurisdictions in the common law, and deals with the
cases of civil wrong
where someone else has to suffer loss or harm which results in legal liability for the person who happens to commit a tortuous act.
Some restrictions that various versions
of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic dangerous or vicious dog designation, without any bite history - banning from city parks and beaches
where other breeds are allowed - banning from leash - free parks
where other breeds are allowed - banning completely from
jurisdiction (although sometimes existing dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and
jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the dog as a restricted dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence
of the dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some
cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction
of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability
of law enforcement to stop owners on the street just to check the dog's status - ability
of law enforcement to seize dogs without proof
of wrongdoing - ability
of law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a dog
The
case M. (C - 398 / 12, M., 5 June 2014) concerns a suspect
of sexual violence (committed against a child) who was subject to parallel investigations in Belgium (
where the crime was allegedly committed) and Italy (because the suspect is Italian and Italian law provides for extraterritorial
jurisdiction in this
case).
However, in
cases where a failure to give proper disclosure has made a fair trial impossible, or prevented the court from doing justice, or in instances
of a flagrant abuse
of process, a superior court will exercise its inherent
jurisdiction — its power to control its own procedure so as to prevent it from being used to achieve injustice — to strike out the
case before or during a trial (see for example Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others [2006] EWHC 1315 (Ch) and CPR 3.4 (5)-RRB-.
[T] he original
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, in
cases where a State is a party, refers to those
cases in which, according to the grant
of power made in the preceding clause,
jurisdiction might be exercised in consequence
of the character
of the party, and an original suit might be instituted in any
of the federal Courts, not to those
cases in which an original suit might not be instituted in a federal Court.
In
jurisdictions where privilege exists, certain steps can be taken in light
of recent
case law to maintain privilege over relevant documents.
Article 11
Cases pertaining to a petition for an order under paragraph 1 of the preceding Article shall be within the jurisdiction of the district court which exercises jurisdiction over the area where the opposite party maintains an address (or a place of residence in cases where the opposite party does not have an address in Japan or the address of the opposite party is unkn
Cases pertaining to a petition for an order under paragraph 1
of the preceding Article shall be within the
jurisdiction of the district court which exercises
jurisdiction over the area
where the opposite party maintains an address (or a place
of residence in
cases where the opposite party does not have an address in Japan or the address of the opposite party is unkn
cases where the opposite party does not have an address in Japan or the address
of the opposite party is unknown).
It examines three different sets
of developments: (i) those areas
where judicial intervention in the English Courts has eroded the principles in
cases in fields including arbitration, ancillary relief and financial services regulation, (ii) the developments under the notionally identical
jurisdiction under EU Regulation 1206/2001 and (iii) the emerging jurisprudence under the new
jurisdiction for non-party disclosure under CPR 31.17.
In a useful reminder for parties who might not otherwise consider themselves to be subject to English
jurisdiction, in the recent
case of Bestolov v Povarenkin, the High Court confirmed that,
where a defendant is domiciled in England, the courts
of this country have
jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline
jurisdiction.
Following its participation in that
case, it created a Committee designated to conduct a more in depth review
of the issue, including commissioning legal research, and further consideration
of experience in
jurisdictions where assisted suicide was legalized.
The new
jurisdiction appears to carry forward one
of the key features
of the LVT - that, in most
cases, the
jurisdiction is one
where costs are not ordered payable.
decided in a copyright
case that one had to look at a real and substantial connection between the defendants and the
jurisdiction of the court — or administrative tribunal — but not at
where the server happened to be.
A lawyer can make a recommendation about when to accept a settlement offer and when to take a
case to trial, depending upon the nature
of the
case, your injuries, permanency, etc., and also the
jurisdiction where the
case is pending.
The Alabama Uniform Child Custody
Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) applies in
cases where a custody decision is made or which impact access to a child — including divorce, legal separation, neglect, dependency, guardianship, paternity, termination
of parental rights, and protection from abuse concerning the legal custody, physical custody and visitation
of children are decided.
I would suggest that the emphasis on the democracy principle is reminiscent
of the Court's emphasis on the principle
of the rule
of law in the recent
case of H v Council,
where the Court interpreted the Treaty provisions on the Court's
jurisdiction with regard to CFSP - matters through the prism
of the principle
of the rule
of law.
A recent English court
case, Football Dataco Ltd et al. v Sportradar GmbH [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch), has held that at least for some purposes, the
jurisdiction of a court over Internet content should be based on
where the server was located, and not
where the information online was read or used.
There are occasions, however,
where legislatures «steal» laws from other
jurisdictions, in which
case they often look to each other for early development
of common law on those laws.
In Vermont before the revision
of the state constitution in 1786 it was not unusual for the legislature to intervene in court
cases, and I know there was at least one
case in Vermont before that
where the legislature granted a divorce, but somehow I got an impression that in bankruptcy
cases in Vermont the legislature was the court
of original
jurisdiction.
In a
jurisdiction where there is no Crown copyright, such as the United States, shouldn't there be evidence
of abuses and risks
of inaccurate legislation or
case law permeating throughout the
jurisdiction?
Gathering a large enough body
of information to create a robust database capable
of accurate predictive analysis would appear challenging in our
jurisdiction,
where we have a much smaller volume
of cases that most American
jurisdictions.
There can hardly be a more poignant example
of the need for international co-operation than the drive against money laundering (which goes hand in hand with that against international corruption), nor a more clear example that, whether for good or ill, we live in a globalised world,
where traditional definitions
of jurisdiction and boundaries may be obstacles to
case prosecution.
In the invoked
cases, the Court has previously decided to decline
jurisdiction where it was obvious from the circumstances
of the
case that EU law was not applicable.
We also represent clients in federal court
where we have successfully obtained defense verdicts in jury trials in premises liability
cases despite the challenges
of litigating in a pro-plaintiff
jurisdiction.
This is the
case, in particular,
where the tribunal applies substantive standards that existed before the entry into force
of the treaty providing for
jurisdiction.
(2) from any final judgment
of the Court
of Québec in a
case where such court has exclusive
jurisdiction under any Act other than this Code;
In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review
of past Singapore
case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose
of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter
of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply,
where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both
jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
Until recently general
jurisdiction over a defendant (i.e.
jurisdiction over any lawsuit against a defendant without regard to the particular facts
of the
case) was present in any state
where a company has a permanent office for the conduct
of business, under half a century
of precedent on the issue that traced back to a U.S. Supreme Court
case known as International Shoe v. State
of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).
For example, if I provide a statement
of law and four citations to different
jurisdictions supporting the statement, you may only see one
case on the screen depending on
where you are currently standing (with the option to see all citations
of course).
I also deal with
cases of criminal relevance; this is
where you can be the real assignee and be the first to record it in your home country, but then a third party tries to be first to record themselves fraudulently in an alternative
jurisdiction.
Existing statutory limits on federal court
jurisdiction limit the
jurisdiction of the U.S. District Courts in most
cases of cases to
cases in which a state court in the state
where the U.S. District Court is located would have either general
jurisdiction or specific
jurisdiction of the defendant (without regard to the fact that the
case might be within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the federal courts as a matter
of subject matter
jurisdiction which pertains to the nature
of the cause
of action asserted rather than the ties
of the defendant to the forum state).
Its outcome will not affect the power
of the Courts
of England and Wales to deal with disputes
where both parties are within this
jurisdiction or
where the common laws will apply in any
case.
Where, as in this
case, it is a complaint
of unlawful treatment the ET is the appropriate specialist tribunal, and accordingly has
jurisdiction.
While the post - «TC Heartland» redistribution
of patent
cases to districts that are already familiar with patent law should be largely uneventful, it is far less clear what will happen in
jurisdictions where patent
cases are currently underrepresented.
The decision halts a 27 - year old expansion
of venue in patent
cases which began in 1990 when an appellate court expanded venue from a corporation's state
of incorporation to any district
where personal
jurisdiction could be established over the alleged infringer.
As noted above, the European Commission's brief makes two basic arguments, the first substantive and the second procedural: (1) that the jurisdictional limits
of the ATS should be defined by reference to international law, in particular that the US should allow universal civil
jurisdiction only in
cases where universal criminal
jurisdiction would normally apply; and (2) that the US's exercise
of universal civil
jurisdiction must be constrained by the procedural limits imposed by international law, in particular by an exhaustion requirement.
They looked at
cases in other
jurisdictions where Norwich type orders had been abused, and pointed to the flexibility
of this mechanism to ensure that it was not used unfairly, abusively or without restriction, and concluded the following,
In this
case, it was held that under section 3
of the Act the court has
jurisdiction to give appropriate relief especially the interim orders
where the seat
of arbitration is outside Bangladesh.
In the exercise
of case management powers, the burden on a defendant who seeks a stay
where a plaintiff has founded
jurisdiction in this country as
of right is particularly significant
where the
jurisdiction of the English court is founded on a contractual provision.
No doubt that practical commercial reality accounts for the paucity
of Canadian
cases in this area — judgment creditors tend to go forward only in those
jurisdictions where little doubt exists that their judgment debtors possess assets.
But it could not avoid the need to determine whether or not permission was to be granted in a
case where the issue as to whether or not there was a ground for
jurisdiction was no more than evenly balanced, or
where the
case in favour
of an agreement was somewhat less convincing than the claim that there was not but was still plausible.
The DIFC Courts have
jurisdiction to make costs orders against third parties, including Funders,
where the Court deems it appropriate, given the circumstances
of the
case.
We expect to see more funded claims across continental Europe, particularly in Italy and Spain, with a rising number
of arbitration
cases in those
jurisdictions, and in Hong Kong and Singapore,
where attitudes towards funding are warming up.
Moreover, an Italian public authority seeking to shield itself behind the authority
of the Italian courts to shut out the
jurisdiction of the English courts may indeed be very unpleasantly surprised as was the
case here
where the Italian Regional Administrative Court
of Piedmont refused
jurisdiction in the above named
cases in favour
of the English courts, a fact taken into account in the judgement
of the English court in the application for summary judgement as further justification for its decision..
Lord Justice Lloyd Jones stated at § 147 that it was common ground that a procedural duty to investigate arose under Article 5 in
cases where there was an arguable claim that a person within the
jurisdiction of a Contracting State had been the subject
of enforced disappearance.
Therefore, the homologation process in Ecuador implies that the party that seeks the enforcement
of a foreign award shall file a petition with the Provincial Court8, which will assess whether the award complies with the following requirements: (i) The international award complies with the formalities required for it to be considered authentic in the state
where it was issued; (ii) The award is final and binding in the
jurisdiction where it was delivered and the attachments are duly legalized; (iii) With regard to the requirement prescribed in the Convention, if the award is in a language other than the official language
of the country, in this
case Spanish, it shall incorporate a translation; (iv) It is shown from the legal papers
of the arbitration proceedings that the party against whom the awards is being enforced was duly notified
of the claim and that there was no due process violation; (v) The petition must specify the domicile
of the party against whom the award is being enforced.