Sentences with phrase «jurisdiction of the family court»

There is no such thing as a care order for adults and the jurisdiction is not to be equated with the jurisdiction of family courts under the Children Act 1989 or the wardship jurisdiction of the High Court (para 24).

(4) The Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice may, from time to time, temporarily assign a judge referred to in clause (1)(d) or (e) to hear matters outside the jurisdiction of the Family Court.

Take notice that this is a court order within the jurisdiction of the family court.

Jurisdiction of Family Court, State Family Courts, Northern Territory Supreme Court and Federal Circuit Court... 280

(1) The regulations may provide that, from a date specified in the regulations (not being a date before the regulations are registered under the Legislation Act 2003), the jurisdiction of the Family Court under this Act in relation to all proceedings, or a specified class of proceedings, must not be exercised in a specified State or Territory, or in 2 or more specified States and Territories.

Not exact matches

More than anything else; Family Court deals primarily with child support and juvenile offenders not yet under the jurisdiction of the adult criminal justice system.

«If the parent or other person having control of a child who is a truant fails to attend the meeting held pursuant to subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of this section or if such parent or other person otherwise fails to cooperate with the school in attempting to solve the truancy problem, such policies and procedures shall require the superintendent of schools to file, not later than fifteen calendar days after such failure to attend such meeting or such failure to cooperate with the school attempting to solve the truancy problem, for each such truant enrolled in the schools under his jurisdiction a written complaint with the Superior Court pursuant to section 46b - 149 alleging the belief that the acts or omissions of the child are such that the child's family is a family with service needs.

With jurisdiction over criminal, civil, and family matters, the Superior Court of Justice is integral to delivering justice to all Ontarians.

This is certainly true in Wisconsin: «When the action is an action affecting the family, and when the residence requirements... have been met, a court having subject matter jurisdiction need not have grounds for personal jurisdiction in order to make a determination of the status of a marriage.»

The prenuptial agreement also stated that the Family Court would not have jurisdiction over any pre-marital property of either party or over property acquired after the marriage, unless same be titled in joint names, and that this agreement as to the absence of jurisdiction shall be unmodifiable.

Posted Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 10 Comments»

Tags: Child Custody Modification, Litigation Strategy, Uniform Interstate Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) Posted in Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 3 Comments»

Posted Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific

Posted Friday, March 16th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquof Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

The family court determined that, because the parties had agreed only the issues of divorce and child support were before the family court, it did not have jurisdiction over the issue of attorney's fees.

Posted Friday, March 16th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specifof Parental Rights, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina SpecifOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina SpecifOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific

If Pennsylvania declines jurisdiction, the family court shall request Pennsylvania issue an order finding it no longer retains exclusive, continuing jurisdiction Pennsylvania Courts do not have jurisdiction over the matter of custody of this minor child.

The Court of Appeals, relying upon the case of Gilley v. Gilley, 327 S.C. 8, 488 S.E. 2d 310 (1997), held that when a prenuptial agreement divests the family court of jurisdiction over property distribution, the proper forum to seek enforcement is in the Circuit CCourt of Appeals, relying upon the case of Gilley v. Gilley, 327 S.C. 8, 488 S.E. 2d 310 (1997), held that when a prenuptial agreement divests the family court of jurisdiction over property distribution, the proper forum to seek enforcement is in the Circuit Ccourt of jurisdiction over property distribution, the proper forum to seek enforcement is in the Circuit CourtCourt.

Posted Tuesday, October 18th, 2016 by Gregory Forman Filed under Department of Social Services / Child Abuse and Neglect, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 9 Comments&raquof Social Services / Child Abuse and Neglect, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 9 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 9 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 9 Comments»

This appeal considered whether a commissioning body can, by its decision not to fund a particular option for contact, remove the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection to make a best interests decision about contact, and whether the failure to conduct a best interests assessment and / or determine the facts breached the appellant's rights under the ECHR to a fair trial and a family life.

Tags: Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Uniform Interstate Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) Posted in Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 10 Comments»

Posted Sunday, November 23rd, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys

Posted Sunday, November 23rd, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 3 Comments»

This can create momentously important issues when spouses who are parties to a non-Australian prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement relocate to Australia or if one spouse is of Australian nationality or there exists another basis for the Family Court of Australia to have jurisdiction over a potential divorce case.

Its logic may prove to be indicative of harder times blowing in favour of creditors trustees against the family; or an appellate court may find that a decision in the ancillary relief jurisdiction overrides s 339.

While it comes from the Alberta court of appeal, the comments on the required standard of care in the CFL setting make this decision worthwhile reading for collaborative family law lawyers in other Canadian jurisdictions.

Finally, the family court has jurisdiction over adults indicted for the offenses that are detrimental to the welfare of juveniles.

If, however, your jurisdiction does not have a Unified Family Court, there will be a separate Ontario Court of Justice location and a Superior Court location.

Jurisdiction over Family Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal sJurisdiction over Family Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signifiFamily Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signifiFamily Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal sjurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signififamily as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal significance.

It was Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 that provided a mechanism for someone who has not remarried or entered into a civil partnership to bring a claim in England and Wales against a spouse or former spouse even if a court has already made a financial order in divorce proceedings in another jurisdiction.

David R. Brewer Attorney at Law, PLLC appears for clients in a wide variety of matters over which the Texas Probate and Family Courts have jurisdiction.

She has appeared in the following reported cases: S v S [2017] EWHC 1298 (Fam) involving a fact - finding about allegations of grave harm to the mother and the child and evidence from experts in Iranian family law; and Re: Rodwell [2016] EWHC 1731 (Fam), which centred on questions about whether the court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning the family.

In response to the mother's application, the father filed a Notice of Constitutional Question indicating his intention to challenge the jurisdiction of the court and the applicability of the Family Law Act to the dispute.

Successful emergency interim injunctions to prevent a funeral and to give effect to the wishes of the deceased's family on the grounds of Human Rights and inherent jurisdiction of the High Court.

Yet, in these circumstances, and the context of the crisis facing the family courts, it wasn't in my opinion as problematic as highlighted here given the context of what is occurring in our jurisdiction.

Tags: South Carolina Court of Appeals, Standing, T. Ryan Phillips, Unpublished Opinions, Visitation Posted in Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific, Visitation No Comments&raquof Appeals, Standing, T. Ryan Phillips, Unpublished Opinions, Visitation Posted in Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific, Visitation No Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific, Visitation No Comments»

It additionally provided a forum for Central Authority delegates, Family Court judges, professors, and legal practitioners from Asia - Pacificcountries to share experiences and exchange views on the implementation of the1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention and (where applicable) the 1996Protection of Children Convention in their jurisdictions.

However, in some parts of some provinces, namely Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Ontario and Saskatchewan, there is just one court for family law disputes, a court that has the jurisdiction to deal with all family law problems and all of the laws that might apply to them.

The Committee is convinced that the time has come when important changes and solutions can be implemented only if a Family Court is created with original exclusive jurisdiction over the entire field of matters affecting the fFamily Court is created with original exclusive jurisdiction over the entire field of matters affecting the familyfamily.

First, the 2012 report of the Family Justice Working Group (PDF) of the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, recommended that each jurisdiction establish its own unified family courtFamily Justice Working Group (PDF) of the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, recommended that each jurisdiction establish its own unified family courtFamily Matters, recommended that each jurisdiction establish its own unified family courtfamily court with:

Family law litigants have remained plagued by the confusion and inefficiencies caused by two courts of concurrent family law jurisdiFamily law litigants have remained plagued by the confusion and inefficiencies caused by two courts of concurrent family law jurisdifamily law jurisdiction.

In the order appealed from, the Family Court granted the mother's motion to dismiss the father's petitions based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Anna provided judges with legal opinions and research memoranda in all areas of the Court's jurisdiction, including civil, administrative, family and criminal.

In contrast, the Simpson court had authority to order transfer of the subject properties and it was inappropriate for the family court to modify equitable distribution when it had jurisdiction over the necessary parties to order the transfer.

Tags: Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Prenuptial Agreements, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquof Appeals Posted in Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

Posted Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Attorney's Fees, Equitable Distribution / Property Division, Jurisdiction, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific No Comments»

Tags: Full Faith and Credit Clause, Jurisdiction, South Carolina Supreme Court Posted in Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 1 Comment»

2014) determined that the Meehans» prenuptial divested the family court of jurisdiction for some issues but not the issue of attorney's fees as it related to child custody and support.

The English Court is likely to take into account factors such as whether the defendant's family lives at the property and the number of nights the defendant has spent at that property in recent years, compared to nights spent in other jurisdictions.

Therefore, irrespective of the alleged mistake in the Final Decree, the family court had subject matter jurisdiction to determine the subject properties were marital property and to apportion the subject properties to Wife.