The object of these Rules is to facilitate the just, expeditious and impartial determination of election petition appeals in exercise of the Court's appellate
jurisdiction under Article 164 (3) of the Constitution.
Where the child has his or her habitual residence in the territory of a third State which is not a contracting party to the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children,
jurisdiction under this Article shall be deemed to be in the child's interest, in particular if it is found impossible to hold proceedings in the third State in question.
L.R. 873; [2014] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 223; [2013] 2 C.L.C. 713; [2014] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 327 — appeal against decision of Court of Appeal to overturn decision of Burton J for want of
jurisdiction under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation (see [2012] EWCA Civ 1714; [2013] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 1297; [2013] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 217; [2013] 1 C.L.C. 123; [2013] I.L.Pr.
Second, should this question be answered in the affirmative, the referring court asked the CJEU to shed light on the procedural consequences (question 4) and whether in that case the referring court can assume
jurisdiction under Article 31, which requires a «real connecting link» between the subject matter of the measure sought and the territorial jurisdiction of the Member State (questions 5 and 6).
50 In those circumstances, it is apparent that there is no risk of conflicting decisions as mentioned in paragraph 47 above, since the provisional decision taken by the court before which the interim proceedings have been brought will not in any way prejudice the decision to be taken on the substance by the court having
jurisdiction under Article 22 (4) of Regulation No 44/2001.
The first - instance court in Estonia rejected all claims, arguing that the losses had not been suffered in Estonia and that it therefore lacked
jurisdiction under Article 7 (1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels I Regulation (recast)-RRB-.
In essence, he suggests limiting special
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2) to two fora at the choice of the injured party; the courts in both fora would have jurisdiction to rule on the full claim, irrespective of whether the claimant is a legal or natural person (paras 70 - 72).
On appeal, the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof (OGH) asked the Court which criteria are to be used to determine
jurisdiction under Article 5 (3) to hear an action relating to an alleged infringement of a trademark through the use of a Google AdWord on the website operating under a top - level domain different from that of the Member State where the trademark is registered...
Abandoning the «mosaic» approach to limit the number of potential jurisdictions would more likely reflect the rationale of the special rule of
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2).
In first instance the Estonian court rejected
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2) of the Brussels I Regulation.
Wintersteiger argued that the Austrian judge could assume
jurisdiction under Article 5 (3) since the website google.de is also accessible in Austria.
With this ruling the Court implicitly confirms its jurisprudence on the special rule of
jurisdiction under Article 7 (2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels I Regulation (recast)-RRB- for online infringements of personality rights.
(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original
jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.
Where a court having
jurisdiction under Articles 8 to 15 contemplates the placement of a child in institutional care or with a foster family and where such placement is to take place in another Member State, it shall first consult the central authority or other authority having jurisdiction in the latter State where public authority intervention in that Member State is required for domestic cases of child placement.
Not exact matches
Even today, some scholars argue that it did nothing more than declare that the Supreme Court is within its rights in declining to exercise an authority putatively conferred upon it by Congress when such authority exceeds the
jurisdiction granted to the Court
under Article Three of the Constitution.
Perhaps the U.S. Congress will be able to invoke its powers
under section five of the Fourteenth Amendment; perhaps Congress can use its powers
under Article III to alter the Court's appellate
jurisdiction.
Many of the
articles discussing the Senate passage of the bill mention the recent salmonella / egg recall, yet my understanding is that eggs (and meat) remain
under the USDA's exclusive
jurisdiction.
Common sense should have informed the Government that the provisions of
Article 280 (2) entrusting to the Court of Appeal appellate
jurisdiction over such adverse findings would have been meaningless if the Government had a first administrative review authority to selectively overrule or reject or confirm such adverse findings made against persons by the Commissioner appointed
under Article 278.
A mere reference to a provision of the constitution for a court lower than the Supreme Court to consider will not amount to interpretation as envisaged
under articles 2 (1) and 130 (1) of the 1992 constitution which reserves for the exclusive
jurisdiction of supreme court, if it comes to the interpretation of any provisions in the constitution».
Alright, just for the sake of discussion, could Italy have challenged
Article VII 3 (a)'s
jurisdiction under International law over public safety of its citizens.
The main issue was whether phrases referring to «the territory of Morocco» and «waters
under Moroccan
jurisdiction» (
Article 11 FPA), «fishing zones» of Morocco (
Article 5 FPA), and «waters falling within the sovereignty or
jurisdiction» of Morocco (
Article 2 (a) FPA) were to be understood as including the waters adjacent to Western Sahara.
Article 11 Cases pertaining to a petition for an order
under paragraph 1 of the preceding
Article shall be within the
jurisdiction of the district court which exercises
jurisdiction over the area where the opposite party maintains an address (or a place of residence in cases where the opposite party does not have an address in Japan or the address of the opposite party is unknown).
Though some courts have considered that challenges to personal
jurisdiction may fall
under article V (1)(c), these challenges may alternatively be deemed to constitute disputes in relation to consent and the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, which fall more squarely
under article V (1)(a).
Parties have brought successful challenges to enforcement of arbitral awards
under article V (1)(c) in several
jurisdictions on the grounds that the arbitral award addressed a party that was not bound by the arbitration agreement.
on the other hand, measures applicable to specific entities including Rosneft were targeted at he named entities and the Court has
jurisdiction to review their validity
under Article 275 TFEU;
Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution says that most of the the Supreme Court's
jurisdiction must be exercised «
under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.»
In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of
Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb
under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both
jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
Since the Court did not address the possibility of
jurisdiction to issue provisional measures in interim proceedings
under Article 2 - 24, it seems to me the decision is limited to
jurisdiction for provisional measures
under Article 31.
Article 13 prevents a court to whom an application has been made (and which might have
jurisdiction under Arts 5 — 10) from exercising
jurisdiction if at the time of commencement of those proceedings similar measures have been requested from another court having
jurisdiction under Arts 5 — 10 and which are still pending.
The SCI exercises, inter alia, the following
jurisdictions deriving its powers to do so
under the Constitution of India: original
jurisdiction [Article131], appellate civil
jurisdiction [
Articles 132 and 133], appellate criminal
jurisdiction [
Articles 132 and 134].
In light of this understanding of the Security Council's purpose in creating the International Tribunal, we turn below to discussion of Appellant's specific arguments regarding the scope of the
jurisdiction of the International Tribunal
under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Statute.
Lord Justice Lloyd Jones stated at § 147 that it was common ground that a procedural duty to investigate arose
under Article 5 in cases where there was an arguable claim that a person within the
jurisdiction of a Contracting State had been the subject of enforced disappearance.
... [65]... to the extent that By - law 860 clearly contemplates such an award, it suffers from the same problem in this respect as
Article 16.22 (g) in Roberts — it exceeds the
jurisdiction provided
under the Act for an award of costs.»
The International Court of Justice has rejected
jurisdiction over the claim brought by the Marshall Islands against the United Kingdom, alleging breach of the obligation (
under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty) to negotiate in good faith for nuclear disarmament.
As mentioned in Auto Equity Sales v. Superior Court before the California Supreme Court and as brought in the Wikipedia
article on precedent: «
under the doctrine of stare decisis, all tribunals exercising inferior
jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of courts exercising superior
jurisdiction.»
Whilst taking a slightly different route to get there, the Court of Appeal agreed that the High Court had
jurisdiction to make blocking orders
under section 37 (1) of the Senior Courts Act, as interpreted in light of
Article 11 of the Enforcement Directive (which provides that member states shall ensure that rights holders are in a position to apply for an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an IP right).
Under Article 8 of DIFC Law No 3 of 2004, the Law on the Application of Civil and Commercial Laws in the DIFC, there is provision as to the law to be applied in the DIFC, the objective of which, according to
Article 7, is to provide certainty as to the rights and obligations of persons in civil and commercial matters arising in the DIFC and to allow persons to adopt the laws of another
jurisdiction in relation to such matters.
Given that the DIFC Courts»
jurisdiction is expressed to be exclusive
under Article 5 of Dubai Law No. 12 of 2004, it remains to be seen if other Courts in the region would stay any proceedings brought before it while awaiting the DIFC Courts» decision on the
jurisdiction issue, or if the DIFC Courts would voluntarily stay their exclusive
jurisdiction in favour of another Court.
Thus, even though
under other circumstances
Article 2 (b) may provide
jurisdiction for disputes arising out of an economic transaction rather than an investment, because the Canada - Venezuela Treaty governed and
under the Treaty there was no investment, the alternative jurisdictional basis was not available.
The response to the notice of arbitration may also include: (a) Any plea that an arbitral tribunal to be constituted
under these Rules lacks
jurisdiction; (b) A proposal for the appointment of a sole arbitrator referred to in
article 8, paragraph 1; (c) Notification of the designation of an arbitrator referred to in
articles 9 or 10; (d) A brief description of counterclaims or claims for the purpose of a set - off, if any, including where relevant, an indication of the amounts involved, and the relief or remedy sought; (e) A notice of arbitration in accordance with
article 3 in case the respondent formulates a claim against a party to the arbitration agreement other than the claimant.
Far better to ask the Court to resolve it
under the special procedure in
Article 273 TFEU, which would surely apply: «The Court of Justice shall have
jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of the Treaties if the dispute is submitted to it
under a special agreement between the parties.»
Such a problem would not exist, were arbitral tribunals, including the ICS to be considered a court or tribunal of a Member State, as then it would be able to ask for a preliminary reference ruling
under Article 267 TFEU, thus engaging the
jurisdiction of the CJEU.
(1) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 (Comm); [2012] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 608; [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 162; [2012] 1 C.L.C. 100 — summary judgment on claims by insurers against assured for breach of a settlement agreement and of
jurisdiction agreements in the settlement and in the underlying policy of insurance — constitution of a fund from which to indemnify insurers against future loss and damage resulting from continuation of the foreign proceedings where no anti suit injunction could be granted due to Turner v Grovit and Front Comor — refusal of discretionary stay in favour of Greek court
under Article 28 where stay would condone breach of contract.
In the absence of such a declaration, T's continued placement at X unit would be unlawful and in breach of
article 5 ECHR and due to the need for the restrictions and those being in T's best interests, the deprivation of liberty was authorised
under the inherent
jurisdiction.
Thus it will be seen by these quotations from the opinion that the court, after stating the question it was about to decide in a manner too plain to be misunderstood, proceeded to decide it, and announced, as the opinion of the tribunal, that in organizing the judicial department of the Government in a Territory of the United States, Congress does not act
under, and is not restricted by, the third
article in the Constitution, and is not bound, in a Territory, to ordain and establish courts in which the judges hold their offices during good behaviour, but may exercise the discretionary power which a State exercises in establishing its judicial department and regulating the
jurisdiction of its courts, and may authorize the Territorial Government to establish, or may itself establish, courts in which the judges hold their offices for a term of years only, and may vest in them judicial power upon subjects confided to the judiciary of the United States.
Notwithstanding a judgment of non-return pursuant to
Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention, any subsequent judgment which requires the return of the child issued by a court having
jurisdiction under this Regulation shall be enforceable in accordance with Section 4 of Chapter III below in order to secure the return of the child.
(d)
Article 6 (2) with regard to action of the institutions, in so far as the Court has
jurisdiction under the Treaties establishing the European Communities and
under this Treaty;
To date, the Rome Statute (pdf) only had subject - matter
jurisdiction for three crimes, as listed
under Article 5:
The courts of a Contracting State chosen by the parties and the courts of the Contracting State on the territory of which the object is situated have
jurisdiction to grant relief
under Article 13 (1)(a), (b), (c) and
Article 13 (4) in respect of that object.
A court has
jurisdiction under the preceding paragraphs even if the final determination of the claim referred to in
Article 13 (1) will or may take place in a court of another Contracting State or by arbitration.