Sentences with phrase «jurisdictional rule in»

Next, the referring court enquired about the application of Article 5 (3)'s special jurisdictional rule in the event of infringement of competition law, where that infringement concerns a complex horizontal agreement, spread over a long period of time, and with varying impact in various markets.
In particular, it seeks to ensure respect for the fundamental rights of the child as set out in Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union... Each state is expected to interpret the jurisdictional rules in the same way to achieve the object of «mutual trust».

Not exact matches

Singh, who has long stood in opposition to the project on the grounds that it was approved under what he calls flawed environmental assessment rules adopted by the previous Conservative government, said Wednesday the Trudeau government should, in tandem with B.C., ask the Supreme Court for a reference to resolve what he calls jurisdictional issues.
In December 2011, the Supreme Court ruled that oversight of stock exchanges and other financial markets falls under the jurisdictional control of the provinces.
Indeed, the jurisdictional reach of statutes such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 and the UK Bribery Act 2010 means that conduct in Asia is often at the heart of enforcement actions by UK and US authorities, making the rules of privilege in the UK and US particularly important to multinational corporates.
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes here that the ruling wont» affect habeas statute of limitations, which are not jurisdictional — and notes that the dissent is in line with recent trends to cut back on what is considered «jurisdictional
Civil lawsuit trials can be conducted in a state other than the state where the breach of contract or tort giving rise to the lawsuit took place for jurisdictional purposes and not infrequently is brought in another state, although constitutional choice of law rules limit the circumstances under which a particular state's laws can be applied to a particular set of circumstances in a lawsuit.)
In recent years, however, the CJEU has seemed quite willing to use the ambiguity inherent in these jurisdictional terms to permit the application of EU rules that have legislative effects in third stateIn recent years, however, the CJEU has seemed quite willing to use the ambiguity inherent in these jurisdictional terms to permit the application of EU rules that have legislative effects in third statein these jurisdictional terms to permit the application of EU rules that have legislative effects in third statein third states.
Technically, Rule 3.2.10 refers to «reporters» and not «reporter or database» so I assume the technically correct answer is to include the jurisdictional abbreviation in my Quicklaw example above.
The court's ruling will help to curtail lengthy litigation over jurisdictional issues in cases where patent counterclaims that form the basis for removal fail to present a justiciable Article III case or controversy.»
Prior to the trial, the family law attorney representing the fathers asked KWIKA founder Michael Kump to represent the fathers in the Court of Appeal in order to challenge a jurisdictional ruling made in the trial court.
In order to obtain permission, the claimant will have to show (in relation to each cause of action which forms part of the claim) that: (1) there is a serious issue to be tried in relation to the foreign defendant (i.e. the claim must have a real prospect of success); (2) there is a good arguable case that the claim falls within one or more of the «jurisdictional gateways» set out in the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to exercise its discretion to permit service of the proceedings out of the jurisdictioIn order to obtain permission, the claimant will have to show (in relation to each cause of action which forms part of the claim) that: (1) there is a serious issue to be tried in relation to the foreign defendant (i.e. the claim must have a real prospect of success); (2) there is a good arguable case that the claim falls within one or more of the «jurisdictional gateways» set out in the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to exercise its discretion to permit service of the proceedings out of the jurisdictioin relation to each cause of action which forms part of the claim) that: (1) there is a serious issue to be tried in relation to the foreign defendant (i.e. the claim must have a real prospect of success); (2) there is a good arguable case that the claim falls within one or more of the «jurisdictional gateways» set out in the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to exercise its discretion to permit service of the proceedings out of the jurisdictioin relation to the foreign defendant (i.e. the claim must have a real prospect of success); (2) there is a good arguable case that the claim falls within one or more of the «jurisdictional gateways» set out in the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to exercise its discretion to permit service of the proceedings out of the jurisdictioin the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to exercise its discretion to permit service of the proceedings out of the jurisdiction.
Hodgson's panel, «The Law as a Primary Tool,» will examine such topics as the law and rules applicable to the arbitration agreement and jurisdictional issues in view of latest case law; the law applicable to ancillary issues, such as incorporation of companies, powers of attorney and other issues of representation; the law applicable to the standard of proof and evaluation of evidence; and laws potentially relevant in cases involving States.
An error in an evidentiary ruling on an element of the offence is not a jurisdictional error that is reviewable.
Theses rulings will impact standing concepts and jurisdictional challenges, liability under the WARN and the ERISA, appeals of class certification decisions, challenges to EEOC administrative subpoenas, and rules on American Pipe tolling and application of statute of limitations in class actions.
In order to properly advise these familiesfamily lawyers must have a firm understanding of private international lawprinciples, jurisdictional rules and the relevant international treaties and conventions.
Amended Rule 37 (e) attempts to resolve a major circuit split and other jurisdictional variations in spoliation sanctions analysis in favor of a new, clarified rRule 37 (e) attempts to resolve a major circuit split and other jurisdictional variations in spoliation sanctions analysis in favor of a new, clarified rulerule.
She even had some love for the arguments of Scott Dodson (Hastings), who filed an amicus brief putting forward his theory that a jurisdictional rule is any rule, regardless of source, that places a case in one court and out of another.
Also, flexibility in applying the fourth factor does not amount to jurisdictional overreach ̶ conflict rules vary from one jurisdiction to another.
However, the court determined that the rule at issue in this case was not a jurisdictional rule.
I do not believe there would be such lacuna: the Article 34 rule applies to concurrent proceedings which are in fact in - Regulation, except international comity requires the EU to cede to foreign proceedings with a strong (typically exclusive) jurisdictional call.
Acknowledging that earlier opinions of the Court «have sometimes overlooked th [e] distinction» between jurisdictional limitations and claim - processing rules or elements of a cause of action, Justice Ginsburg explained that «a provision governing the time to appeal in a civil action qualifies as jurisdictional only if Congress sets the time.»
Except as is otherwise provided in these rules, time is directory and not jurisdictional.
In a multi ¬ jurisdictional practice world, firms need to monitor changing rules in dozens of states, with the result being that practice capabilities and competitiveness are hampered in a major market because of the need to comply in a small «satellite office» statIn a multi ¬ jurisdictional practice world, firms need to monitor changing rules in dozens of states, with the result being that practice capabilities and competitiveness are hampered in a major market because of the need to comply in a small «satellite office» statin dozens of states, with the result being that practice capabilities and competitiveness are hampered in a major market because of the need to comply in a small «satellite office» statin a major market because of the need to comply in a small «satellite office» statin a small «satellite office» state.
While Canadian multinational companies had previously been able to avoid lawsuits at home by claiming jurisdictional restrictions, the 2013 Ontario Superior Court ruling in Choc v. Hudbay Minerals Inc. changed that.
To elaborate, the majority opinion took great pains [see FR, pp. 75 - 76] to highlight the similarities between the Hellenic and the Italian legal order, while endorsing unconditionally the position adopted by the Constitutional Court of Italy in its celebrated Sentenza 238/2014 (nullifying as unconstitutional a municipal law binding domestic courts to follow the ICJ's ruling in the Jurisdictional Immunities Case).
Developed and delivered curriculum in military / civilian law as well as jurisdictional rules and regulations.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z