In the FSCO Appeal Decision of State Farm and Sabadash (P16 - 00029), Director's Delegate Evans conducts a thorough analysis of the key
jurisprudence on causation in Canada of the key causation...
In the FSCO Appeal Decision of State Farm and Sabadash (P16 - 00029), Director's Delegate Evans conducts a thorough analysis of the key
jurisprudence on causation in Canada of the key causation decisions: Athey v. Leonati (1996 S.C.C.), Resurfice Corp v. Hanke (2007 S.C.C.).
Justice Cronk writing for the unanimous Court summarized
the jurisprudence on causation in accident benefits matters to that date:
Not exact matches
Between late 1996 and early 2007, Canadian tort
jurisprudence formally had, at least based
on an (ahem) «common sense», grammatical, ordinary, plain etc. etc. reading of Athey, an alternative method for establish factual
causation (cause - in - fact)
on the balance of probability.