You can only discuss the case in the jury room with your fellow
jurors during deliberations.
Indeed, no one, including the judge, is even supposed to be aware of the views of individual
jurors during deliberations, because a jury's independence is best guaranteed by secret deliberations, such that jurors may «return a verdict freely according to their conscience» and their «conduct in the jury room [may be] untrammeled by the fear of embarrassing publicity.»
Dallas told other
jurors during their deliberation what she had found in this way, with the consequence that, when this breach was reported to the trial judge, the trial was stopped.
Not exact matches
The hope is that
jurors who understand the case as best as possible will rely more on the facts than their own, biased opinions
during deliberation.
During two weeks of jury selection, Judge Samuel Feng repeatedly told prospective
jurors that immigration, sanctuary cities, gun control and their political views should not enter into their
deliberations.
Asking the
jurors during a post-trial hearing whether the amount written on Verdict Form B represents their agreement reached
during deliberations directly impeaches the verdict.
Shut up about jury nullification
during voir dire and
deliberations or you could be excluded or removed from the jury, leaving the defendant with no fully informed
juror who will acquit.
During deliberations after the 19 - day trial, one
juror asked whether Takata had ever been sued before for defects in its seat belts.
The ruling, which takes effect Sept. 1, will require Michigan judges for the first time to instruct
jurors not to use any handheld device, such as iPhones or Blackberrys, while in the jury box or
during deliberations
The time and place for coming to your final opinions and speaking about them with your fellow
jurors is
during deliberations in the jury room, after all of the evidence has been presented, closing arguments have been made, and I have instructed you on the law.
This film has some great lessons for potential
jurors, including the intensity of the psychology and interpersonal dynamics
during deliberations, the need to be skeptical of the prosecution's case, the gravity of what is at stake for the defendant as compared to the minor inconveniences for
jurors, and so on.
Further, it is clear that Mr. Lamb's comments had no effect on the
juror or the jury pool because nullification or anything of that nature was not discussed
during jury
deliberations or at any time.
During contentious
deliberations, the trial judge in U.S. v. Thomas dismissed
Juror Number 5 — the only black juror in a trial of all black defendants — based on the belief that Juror Number 5 was engaging in jury nullification and would not convict the defendants under any circumsta
Juror Number 5 — the only black
juror in a trial of all black defendants — based on the belief that Juror Number 5 was engaging in jury nullification and would not convict the defendants under any circumsta
juror in a trial of all black defendants — based on the belief that
Juror Number 5 was engaging in jury nullification and would not convict the defendants under any circumsta
Juror Number 5 was engaging in jury nullification and would not convict the defendants under any circumstances.
There was evidence, however, that the definition on the website had changed from the entry the
juror had consulted
during deliberation.
The 15th page of the 19 - page decision noted that Lewie's attorney, Matthew Hug, argued the trial judge erred by not removing a female
juror who had sent an «odd and inappropriate» note
during deliberations.
In U.S. v. Lawson, on the other hand, the federal Fourth Circuit addressed at length the reliability concerns presented by reliance on Wikipedia.32 The issue arose when, despite the trial court's explicit instruction not to conduct research on the internet or otherwise, a
juror reviewed,
during deliberations, a Wikipedia definition of an element of the crime with which the defendant was charged.33 The
juror no longer had the original Wikipedia entry but obtained a printout two weeks later in anticipation of his appearance before the court on complaints of
juror misconduct.
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that testimony about
juror statements made
during deliberation is not admissible to show dishonesty
during voir dire.
During deliberations,
jurors must communicate about the case only with one another and only when all
jurors are present in the jury room.
Only 30 of the 508 judges who responded reported instances of detected social media use by
jurors during trials or
deliberations.
The most common strategy is incorporating social media use into jury instructions -LRB-...) Also common are the practice of reminding
jurors on a regular basis not to use social media to communicate
during trial or
deliberations, explaining the reasons behind the ban on social media, and confiscating electronic devices in the courtroom.