Sentences with phrase «jury award apple»

A jury awarded Apple $ 1 billion in 2012, finding that Samsung had used Apple's patented tap - to - zoom technology, but the court subsequently reduced the damages.

Not exact matches

On Tuesday, April 10, 2018, a federal jury in Eastern District of Texas awarded VirnetX Holding Corp. (VHC) with a $ 502.6 million verdict against Apple Inc. finding that Apple was...

The impact of the court's shift in the infringement analysis was evident in December 2013, when a jury in San Jose, California, awarded $ 290 million to Apple Inc..

Simply put, Judge Koh saw no indication that the jury did not consider all of the damages Apple suffered when it determined, on a per - product basis, its damages award.

At the end of the tort trial, the jury also awarded the Plaintiff damages under these categories, but lumped them all together so that it was impossible to determine, on an «apples to apples» basis, how much should be deducted from each category.

Also, which Apple's motion does not say, Samsung's own reverse - engineering of the jury award does not identify any correlation between the disgorgement award and the number of design patents deemed infringed.

Just days before the US jury decision in August, a court in Korea ruled that both Apple and Samsung had infringed each other's patents, but awarded only nominal damages because there was no possibility any consumers could have confused one company's products for the other's.

Apple's long - running complaint that Samsung infringed its design patent for the iPhone originally went Apple's way with a jury award of $ 399 million in damages.

The biggest deal here, by far, is Apple's loss on willful infringement, where if the jury's finding of willfulness was upheld and taken to its limit, it could have resulted in $ 3 billion in damages awarded to Apple.

On those, the jury awarded the same 100 % of Apple's claimed lost profits and reasonably royalties plus the exact average of the parties» calculations of total infringer's profits (61.4 % of Apple's expert's number because even Samsung didn't argue that there were no profits).

A Texas jury decision to award damages of $ 533 million against Apple for infringing three patents owned by NPE Smartflash Technologies has rightly attracted a lot of headlines.

Still, patent trolls remain a major thorn in the side for tech companies, as evidenced by a $ 625 million verdict a Texas jury awarded against Apple last month.

A jury then awarded $ 399 million in damages to Apple, which amounted to the whole sum of Samsung's profits on the phones it sold infringing these patents.

Last year, a U.S. federal jury in California ruled that Samsung violated some of Apple's patents and awarded the company based in Cupertino, Calif., damages of nearly $ 1 billion.

A jury in 2012 awarded US$ 1 billion to Apple, finding that Samsung had used some of Apple's tap - to - zoom technology.

A jury agreed with that assessment and awarded Apple $ 1.05 billion, a figure that was later trimmed to $ 939.8 million after the judge pointed out errors in the way the jury did its math.