Sentences with phrase «jury found the owner»

A Columbia County jury found the owner guilty of 43 felony neglect charges.

Not exact matches

A jury found defendant insurance broker liable to plaintiff art gallery owner for damages resulting from an insurance carrier's denial of a dealer fine art policy claim after plaintiff sued insurer and incurred fees in pursuing insurance coverage.

On May 14, 2009 attorney Michael Chandler of the law firm of Hull & Chandler obtained a jury verdict in the amount of $ 44,100 against a dog owner who was found to be negligent.

At trial, the jury found that the policy was voided due to the property owner's misrepresentations.

Following our automobile accident example from before, let's say the jury found that driver of the company owned truck that hit the defendant was under specific orders from the owner of the company to «break the rules if you have to» in order to deliver the product on time.

In the second, the jury found that the municipality had taken the property in bad faith in violation of the Fifth Amendment and awarded the property owners additional monies that represented the loss of an option contract.

As reported in the media the jury found that the owner's fear of dogs did not constitute a disability as defined in the Fair Housing Act.

The Court held that a jury could have found that Buyer became interested in the property through Broker's efforts, determined to buy it, and, but for Buyer's representation to the Owner that no broker was involved, it was reasonably probable that plaintiff would have consummated the sale.

The court ruled that the jury was properly instructed that Hubbell needed to show that he had satisfied all the terms and conditions of its agreement with the Owner in order to be entitled to a commission, which is what the jury found in making the commission award to Hubbell.

The court found that all of this could lead to the conclusion by a jury that the Owner and Licensee had planned to defraud the Purchaser, and so the court sent the fraud allegations back to the trial court for further consideration.

If the jury found that the Disclosure Statement falsely represented the property as having no structural defects, then the Owner would be liable for breach of contract.

The Owner argued that the trial court should have required the jury to find that the Tenant still recognized Hubbell as its «exclusive agent» at the time the parties entered into the lease.

The case went to trial, and a jury found in favor of the Owners, awarding them $ 193,419.60 from Deshields and $ 128,946.40 from the Brokerage.