Simply put,
jury nullification refers to the phenomenon of jurors flatly refusing to apply a law in circumstances where society's view of criminality differs from that of our Criminal Code.
«The term
jury nullification refers to that rare situation where a jury knowingly chooses not to apply the law and acquits a defendant regardless of the strength of the evidence against him.
Not exact matches
«This Court has
referred to the
jury's power to nullify as the citizen's ultimate protection against oppressive laws and the oppressive enforcement of the law» and it has characterized the
jury nullification power as a safety valve for exceptional cases... [H] owever,... recognizing this reality that a
jury may nullify is a far cry from suggesting that counsel may encourage a
jury to ignore a law they do not support or to tell a
jury that it has a right to do so...
Jury nullification usually
refers to the non-guilty version but
juries can convict without evidence just as easily as they can acquit in spite of it.
Jury nullification in the broader (and less common) sense of the phrase used in this question, refers to cases where the jury actually ignored the law as applied to what the jury believed actually happened from a factual perspective in light of their actual knowledge and not just what was presented at tr
Jury nullification in the broader (and less common) sense of the phrase used in this question,
refers to cases where the
jury actually ignored the law as applied to what the jury believed actually happened from a factual perspective in light of their actual knowledge and not just what was presented at tr
jury actually ignored the law as applied to what the
jury believed actually happened from a factual perspective in light of their actual knowledge and not just what was presented at tr
jury believed actually happened from a factual perspective in light of their actual knowledge and not just what was presented at trial.