[Civil liberties lawyers urged a state judge to reverse Staten Island DA Dan Donovan's attempt to keep secret the grand
jury testimony concerning the police chokehold death of Eric Garner....]
Civil liberties lawyers urged a state judge to reverse Staten Island DA Dan Donovan's attempt to keep secret the grand
jury testimony concerning the police chokehold death of Eric Garner, saying the public needs to reconcile a widely watched video of the arrest with the decision not to indict the officer involved.
Not exact matches
Lynch wrote that the law
concerning grand
jury testimony «does not grant the right to a second opportunity to give further
testimony, following the completion of the people's examination.
This evidence raises
concerns that the
jury overlooked legitimate credibility issues about Ms. Scott's
testimony, because it was bolstered by her apparent admission against interest: her own guilty plea to the same crime.»
C.A. and argued the trial judge erred by 1) admitting three agreed statements of fact, and 2) providing the
jury with an inadequate Vetrovec warning
concerning the
testimony of unsavoury witnesses.
In the U.S. all trials are publicly accessible unless a witness has some privacy
concerns (like they are still undercover) but the
jury and accused are still able to hear the
testimony.