The Los Angeles Times reports that it and the New York Times were among media outlets that decided not to run accounts of the purported grand
jury testimony today, because they could not confirm that the transcript matched that on file in Santa Barbara County Superior Court.
Not exact matches
From
today's Philadelphia Inquirer's report on Cardinal Bevilacqua's
testimony to a grand
jury investigating the pedophilia coverup in the Philadelphia Archdiocese during the Cardinal's tenure:
And The Tulsa World
today contains an article headlined «
Jury in ex-judge's case sees photos» that begins, «Graphic photos and
testimony marked the second day of trial for a former Creek County judge accused of masturbating while on the bench.»
In other coverage, The Tulsa World reports
today that «
Jury pool quizzed on tolerance; Possible jurors in a former Creek County judge's trial are warned that
testimony could be sexually explicit.»