Sentences with phrase «jury trial if»

You can not have a jury trial if you're charged with an infraction.

Another reason to hire an attorney to assist you in resolving your insurance claim is because attorneys have a whole toolbox available that the average person does not, such as filing a lawsuit, forcing the insurance company to turn over all relevant documents related to your claim, or even taking your claim to a jury trial if the insurer refuses to fairly compensate you.

If necessary I will file a lawsuit and proceeding to a jury trial if it is in your best interest.

The low - income tenant deserved the same level of zealous legal representation than the rich corporation that I would have represented in the old law firm, so every case we demand a jury trial where the attorneys at Basta at great personal sacrifice and time are willing and do take every case to jury trial if we do not get the results we want in a resolution.

Our attorneys have the experience it takes to work your case all the way to jury trial if need be.

Not exact matches

A San Francisco jury trial on the matter had been set to start in June, but that could be taken off the table if the judge presiding over the case approves the agreement.

As one airline lawyer commented after the trial: «Having a jury determine that the provisions in that contract were illegal obviously raises very serious implications for Sabre if they want to continue to insist on them in contracts.»

If Gawker does lose the jury trial, it is likely to win on appeal.

March 28, 2018: Avenatti files a motion requesting a jury trial to determine if the hush agreement was ever binding, and asking for the right to depose Trump and Cohen for «no more than two hours» each.

If I were on trial, I would hope the jury is made up of people who only accept proof, not the kind that believe something on faith.

I am sure that if anyone were charged with a crime, or is on trial, I am sure that if any of those lines were used in the presence of a police officer, judge, jury, etc., that person would be ticking off that person and hurting his own case.

If I am ever a defendant in a murder trial, I hope you are on the jury.

Aaron Hernendezs trial will end jury selection this week but theres no chance the trial is going to start if Boston roads are going to be looking like the inside of his nostrils.

Two others were also excused when they told Manhattan federal Judge Valerie Caproni that their hatred of corruption was so strong they wouldn't want themselves on the jury if they were on trial.

Sharpton criticized the length of time that each grand jury has been working without a decision and what he termed grand jury roles that «appear to be improperly expanded to where it is about trying to prove or disprove the accused rather than to see if there's probable cause to go to trial».

If lower court Jury trials are considered important enough to provide alternates, how is it that such a useful practice has never trickled up to the highest court?

In Thursday's ruling, the appellate court ruled the judge's erroneous instruction to the jury at Silver's trial «was not harmless because it is not clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have reached the same conclusion if properly instructed, as is required by law for the verdict to stand.»

If you're looking for a guide to the upcoming federal corruption trial of former top Cuomo aide Joseph Percoco and businessmen Peter Galbraith Kelly, Jr., Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi, look no further than the jury questionnaire recently agreed to by prosecutors and the defense.

They also say the plan would prejudice a jury if allowed into their upcoming corruption trial.

The SC is not a trial court but an appellate one and should never constitute itself into a prosecutor, judge and jury and sit in its own cause as if it is the Chief's Palace where the accused is hauled before the Chief and his elders, tried, found guilty and ordered to present seventy - two rams and seventy - two bottles of schnapps to pacify the gods and ancestors in a constitutional democracy.

If all interrogations were recorded, juries and trials would be able to listen to a story and look at the body language and everything else involved in making a statement.

But White Plains federal Judge Kenneth Karas said such evidence would confuse the jury because, if true, it's a «completely different scheme» than for what Smith will be on trial beginning Jan. 5 when he faces corruption charges for allegedly trying to buy his way onto the Republican line for mayor last year.

When Lara Frumkin, then at the University of Maryland in Baltimore, set up mock trials using videotaped eyewitness testimony, the jury perceived the same person to be less credible if they spoke with a foreign accent (Psychology, Crime & Law, vol 13, p 317).

After the judge dismissed the «jury» at the beginning of the trial (he actually didn't make us leave, the dismissal was for dramatic effect), he and the lawyers went through the procedures that would be undertaken in a real case to determine if evidence should be admitted for the jury to see.

In this case, subjects had to judge others» actions, as if they were jury members in a trial.

Therefore, if truncating or throwing out scientific evidence (limine is the legal term of trial lawyerly art) leads to a jury concluding that, say, evolution isn't so, all good men and true must concede that the Discovery Institute has won and Darwin has lost the case.

25.8 With the exception of your agreement to waive any right to a jury trial or to participate in a class action, if any other provision in this Section 25 is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be fully severable, this Section 25 shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part of this section, and the remaining provisions of this section shall remain in full force and effect.

First, they opt to hold Simpson's trial (and, therefore, jury selection) in downtown Los Angeles rather than in Santa Monica, so they're not faced with having to awkwardly explain away a mostly (if not all) white jury.

If for any reason a claim proceeds in court rather than in arbitration you and we each waive any right to a jury trial.

- IF FOR ANY REASON A CLAIM PROCEEDS IN COURT, RATHER THAN IN ARBITRATION, YOU AND WE EACH WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL.

Further, should you reject the Arbitration process (or if a court or federal regulator determine the Arbitration process inapplicable), you agree to waive your right to jury trial and proceed in a non-jury court proceeding.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

Original report:   A Blair County, Pennsylvania jury will soon decide if Tammy S. Grimes should be convicted of theft and receiving stolen property.  The trial is set for December 12, 13, and 14.

And if Mann's lawsuit is dismissed by the courts, and even if it eventually goes to trial and he loses a jury verdict, Mann will publicly claim that he was in the right regardless of what the courts and / or the jury decided, and that he will not be deterred from filing other lawsuits against anyone who publicly characterizes his work as fraudulent.

Asked if climate change should be «acquitted» in a jury trial where it stood charged with responsibility for tornadoes, Carbin replied: «I would say that is the right verdict, yes.»

Also, I'm pretty confident that if there ever were an actual trial (which there won't be because the claims will be dismissed on summary judgment), with a majority white jury, the Defendants would win pretty easily.

Counsel for both parties declined an offer to poll the jury, and both parties replied negatively when asked by the trial court if there was «any reason that this should not be entered as a verdict and a judgment at this time.»

Also, the judge is within his rights to punish the potential juror if he determines that the potential juror is actually lying about his ability to be impartial in an effort to evade jury service rather than because he sincerely believes that he can't be fair, and judges have wide authority to determine the credibility and truthfulness of statements made to him in open court (i.e. if the trial judge finds that you are lying, this determination will almost always be honored by an appellate court considering the judge's actions).

If you do go to trial and get a guilty verdict, you can ask that the jury be the ones to assess punishment.

You have a right to a jury trial for a traffic ticket in Texas if the fine is more than 20 dollars, and unless you waive that right, they have to provide it for you.

If you do sign something waiving your right to a jury trial, you could possibly take defensive driving, ask the court for deferred adjudication, or anything else the judge wants to let you do.

- also not that if you also want the jury to assess the fine if they find you guilty then you NEED to ask the judge to tell them to do that PRIOR to the start of the trial.

If you're prepared to presume, absent something relevant to the contrary, the validity of what amounts to an unexplained jury decision so long as the relevant evidence is capable of supporting that decision, what's the basis for your problem with what the trial judge did here (assuming you have a problem)?

in a case in which a witness's identification of the defendant is at issue, and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a trial court is required to give, upon request, during final instructions, a jury charge on the cross-race effect, instructing (1) that the jury should consider whether there is a difference in race between the defendant and the witness who identified the defendant, and (2) that, if so, the jury should consider (a) that some people have greater difficulty in accurately identifying members of different race than in accurately identifying members of their own race and (b) whether the difference in race affected the accuracy of the witness's identification.

On the new trial, the jury should be instructed that if there were an industry - wide collective bargaining agreement whereby employers and the union agreed on a

It also noted that trial and appellate courts were «not entirely powerless» because a judgment may be vacated if «there is no evidence to support the jury's decision,» and because «appellate review is available to test the sufficiency of the jury instructions.»

For the majority of offences, no permission from the CPS or equivalent is needed and so the first step is usually an application to a magistrates» court to issue a summons or warrant which, if granted, begins the proceedings culminating in a trial either in the magistrates court, or in an appropriate case before a jury in the crown court.

Preparing in this manner ensures the strongest case posture every step of the way and, if trial is necessary, it means that we will present a well - prepared case to the jury.

If your case goes to trial, it will most likely be set for a jury trial in the Coachella Valley within 18 months.

In addition, if a jury's decision to nullify is obviously contrary to the evidence presented at trial, the party that was disadvantaged by the nullification may decide to file a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct.