Sentences with phrase «jury verdict form»

Because of an error with the jury verdict form in which an instruction regarding comparative negligence was left out, the judge ordered a retrial on that issue alone.

The jury's role is always the same - show up, be selected and sworn in, listen to the opening and closing arguments and the evidence that the judge admits under the rules of evidence, listen to the jury instructions from the judge, deliberate and render a verdict based upon that deliberation in a manner set forth on a jury verdict form that the jury is provided with by the judge, they do this for sub-minimum wage jury fees, a few free meals, and maybe a parking or transit voucher.

Not exact matches

Prosecutors proposed that the jury be presented with a special verdict form that would have revealed on which theory, if either, the jury convicted on.

Its panel ruled that since the defendants rejected the prosecutor's suggestion for a special verdict form, they forfeited their right to object to the jury instructions.

According to an affidavit filed by one of the jurors after the trial, the jury unanimously agreed that the plaintiff, Martha Sienkowski, should be awarded $ 336,300 but «we had trouble trying to figure out the verdict form, and sent a note through the bailiff to that effect seeking further instructions.»

«Jury Confusion About Verdict Form Costs Plaintiff Over $ 200,000 in Damages Main Tuesday's Three Burning Legal Questions»

Earlier this month the Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form worked.

When no help was provided by the court, the jury took a shot at completing the verdict form, as follows:

Presented with this verdict form following the trial, the court observed that the Verdict Amount ($ 336,300) did not equal $ 207,600 multiplied by 62 percent, and asked the jury to reconsider its computverdict form following the trial, the court observed that the Verdict Amount ($ 336,300) did not equal $ 207,600 multiplied by 62 percent, and asked the jury to reconsider its computVerdict Amount ($ 336,300) did not equal $ 207,600 multiplied by 62 percent, and asked the jury to reconsider its computations.

Then the lawyer submits up to five verdict and five feedback questions using an automated «form builder» and sends the case to the jury.

The jury does all of this according to the judge's instructions and a verdict form provided by the judge.

«Claimed Memory Loss from Airbag Deployment Leads to Suspension of Attorney's Law License Main Jury Confusion About Verdict Form Costs Plaintiff Over $ 200,000 in Damages»

Finally, the lawyer submits up to five verdict and five feedback questions using an automated «form builder» and then sends the case to the jury.

On January 25, 2012, after 3 days of trial in the Western District of Tennessee, the jury explicitly found in their verdict form that the accident was not the fault of Leroy - Somer and was the fault of the plaintiff Flatt.

With a track record that includes millions of dollars recovered in the form of insurance settlements and jury verdicts in favor of our clients, we have proven our ability to get results in personal injury, on the job injury, insurance claim, and wrongful death cases.

Whether consulting on dispositive motions, preserving issues for potential review, or drafting critical motions in limine, jury instructions, or special verdict forms, Wendy's appellate perspective positions clients to secure common sense, correct, and just appellate outcomes.

When a rear driver is able to meet the requirements of his or her burden of proof, then the case is brought to the jury and the plaintiff does not get an automatic win in the form of a «directed verdict.»

In personal injury claims, we have helped our clients recover millions of dollars in the form of insurance settlements and jury verdicts, while our criminal defense clients are frequently able to enjoy the experience of walking out of the courthouse after an acquittal or dismissal of the charges they faced.

The jury was not required to explain their decision on the verdict form and indicated only that the defendant should not be liable for the boy's death.

Both in the «solemn» and the «summary» acquittals, not proven is interpreted as indicating that the jury or judge, respectively, is not convinced of the innocence of the accused; in fact, they may be morally or even factually convinced that the accused is guilty, but do not find the proofs sufficient for a conviction under the elements of the crime on the jury instruction / verdict form.

Savvy clients also regularly bring GMSR in long before the appellate stage to draft dispositive motions, review proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, and advise on strategy with an eye toward appeal.

As a deputy attorney general, Mr. Kenny gained first - chair trial experience in complex litigation in federal court, wrote and argued dispositive motions, drafted mediation and settlement conference statements, took and defended depositions, and prepared all forms of trial documents, including motions in limine, jury instructions, voir dire questions, and verdict forms.